MEIJATINA SARI JOHANNA v ENCORP ISKANDAR DEVELOPMENT SDN BHD

ba-22ncvc-129-03-2022 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 3 February 2026 • BA-22NCvC-129-03/2022 • 24 min read
14 cases cited (0 SG, 14 foreign)

Outcome

In light of the above findings, the Defendant’s application is allowed.

Quoted verbatim from the judgment of High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) (ba-22ncvc-129-03-2022). Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal for the complete decision.

Catchwords

This is the Defendant’s application under Order 14A of the Rules of Court 2012 vide Enclosure 59. Having considered the affidavits filed by the parties, the written and oral submissions, I allowed the Defendant’s application in part. In consequence, the Amended Statement of Claim of all Plaintiffs was dismissed, save for Plaintiffs No. 135 and 136. The claim of Plaintiffs No. 135 and 136 was allowed in the sum of RM299,977.39 together with interest at the rate of 5% per annum from the date of filing of the action until full payment. I further ordered costs of RM5,000.00 to the Defendant, to be paid by all Plaintiffs except Plaintiffs No. 135 and 136.

Practice Areas

Civil Procedure

Judges (1)

Noor Hayati binti Haji Mat Delivered

Counsel (5)

K L Wong Firm Zain Megat & Murad Firm Kavyaasrini a/p S. Mahendran Counsel Defendant Muhammad Asyraf bin Abd Aziz Counsel Defendant Wong Renn Xin Counsel Plaintiff

Parties (2)

ENCORP ISKANDAR DEVELOPMENT Sdn Bhd Defendant Meijatina Sari Johanna Plaintiff

Statutes Cited

Limitation Act 1953 (Cap 254)
s 6
Rules of Court 2012

Cases Cited (14)

MY (14)
[1971] 1 MLJ 32 [1987] 2 MLJ 311 [1995] 3 MLJ 331 [2004] 1 MLJ 8 [2010] 3 MLJ 784 [2011] 6 MLJ 297 [2012] 2 MLJ 299 [2013] 1 MLJ 650 [2014] 6 MLJ 31 [2014] 6 MLJ 747 [2015] 2 MLJ 441 [2019] 4 MLJ 243 [2020] 1 MLJ 281 [2021] 2 MLJ 60

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ba-22ncvc-129-03-2022)