Goldbell Capital Sdn Bhd v 1. ) ST Healthcare Group Sdn Bhd 2. ) Safarudin Bin Tambi

ba-22ncc-45-03-2024 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 10 March 2025 • BA-22NCC-45-03/2024

Catchwords

O14 – O20 - After hearing both parties, I find that the proposed amendment was irrelevant to the main cause of action by the Plaintiff. The proposed amendment had strayed too far from the present defence filed. It was as good as a new defence being put forward on irrelevant issues regarding a third entity that is not a party to the Hire Purchase Agreements Defendant's application in enclosure 12 was dismissed with cost - On the application for summary judgment, I agree with Plaintiff that Defendants had failed to show triable issues, and I am satisfied that the requirement of an O14 application is sufficiently proved by Plaintiff for judgment to be recorded as prayed for.

Practice Areas

O14

Judges (1)

Noor Hayati binti Haji Mat Delivered

Parties (3)

Goldbell Capital Sdn Bhd Plaintiff ST Healthcare Group Sdn Bhd Defendant Safarudin bin Tambi Defendant

Case Significance

Goldbell Capital Sdn Bhd v 1. ) ST Healthcare Group Sdn Bhd 2. ) Safarudin Bi... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated March 10, 2025 (citation: ba-22ncc-45-03-2024). The case was decided by Noor Hayati binti Haji Mat.

What was the outcome of Goldbell Capital Sdn Bhd v 1. ) ST Healthcare Group Sdn Bhd 2. ) Safarudin Bi...?

Goldbell Capital Sdn Bhd v 1. ) ST Healthcare Group Sdn Bhd 2. ) Safarudin Bi... is a High Court decision dated March 10, 2025. The case was heard by Noor Hayati binti Haji Mat. See the full judgment for details.