1. ) TENGKU SHAHNAS BINTI TENGKU ADNAN 2. ) MUHAMMAD TAIYIB BIN AHMAD KHAIRANI 3. ) AHMAD MUSTAZA BIN ISMAIL 4. ) ISMI BIN MD NASSIR 5. ) TIRMIDZIE BIN MANSOR 6. ) ZUHAILI BINTI MD IBRAHIM 7. ) NAFISAH BINTI RADIN 8. ) EFFINDI BIN ISMAIL 9. ) SAIFUL BIN IBRAHIM 10. ) AB AZIZ BIN JUSOH 11. ) NASIR AHMAD @ NAZRI AHMAD BIN CHANAN DIN v 1. ) JAHASRAT HOLDINGS SDN BHD 2. ) NOR HARYANTI BINTI MOHAMAD 3. ) MOHD HAFIZ BIN MOHAMAD 4. ) MOHAMAD BIN YAHYA 5. ) NORASHIKEN BINTI MOHAMED 6. ) ATON BINTI MD...

ba-22ncc-185-10-2024 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 19 April 2026 • BA-22NCC-185-10/2024 • 18 min read
13 cases cited (0 SG, 13 foreign)

Outcome

For the reasons set out above, the Plaintiffs claim is allowed against all the Defendants and damages to be assessed.

Quoted verbatim from the judgment of High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) (ba-22ncc-185-10-2024). Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal for the complete decision.

Catchwords

Practice Areas

Judges (1)

Counsel (5)

Parties (18)

Statutes Cited

Rules of Court 2012

Cases Cited (13)

MY (13)
[1969] 1 MLJ 22 [1980] 1 MLJ 109 [1986] 1 MLJ 34 [2001] 2 CLJ 474 [2011] 1 MLJ 777 [2011] 7 MLJ 382 [2014] 3 CLJ 1 [2016] 8 CLJ 804 [2017] 5 CLJ 418 [2017] MLJU 711 [2021] MLJU 2485 [2023] 1 MLJ 459 [2026] 2 CLJ 803

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ba-22ncc-185-10-2024)