BANDAR UTAMA CITY ASSETS SDN. BHD. v 1. ) Rotol (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd. 2. ) Chua Kah Seng 3. ) Marx Chua Wei King

ba-12a-33-07-2025 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 20 January 2026 • BA-12A-33-07/2025 • 15 min read

4 cases cited (0 SG, 4 foreign)

Outcome

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. The order of the SCJ is affirmed, with costs of RM5,000.00 to the Respondents, subject to the allocator.

Quoted verbatim from the judgment of High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) (ba-12a-33-07-2025). Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal for the complete decision.

Catchwords

This is an appeal by the Plaintiff against the decision of the Session Court Judge (SCJ) dated 21 July 2025, allowing the 1st Defendant’s application for an interlocutory injunction. Having heard the parties and having considered the Appeal Record and the written submissions by both parties, I dismissed the appeal with costs of RM5,000.00, subject to the allocator.

Practice Areas

Civil Procedure

Judges (1)

Noor Hayati binti Haji Mat Delivered

Counsel (5)

Josephine, L K Chow & Co Firm Lee & Poh Partnership Firm Aw Kai Xiang Counsel Respondent Pearly Chua Li May Counsel Appellant Tan Sue Hua Counsel Respondent

Parties (4)

BANDAR UTAMA CITY ASSETS Sdn Bhd Appellant Rotol Sdn Bhd Respondent Chua Kah Seng Respondent Marx Chua Wei King Respondent

Statutes Cited

Specific Relief Act 1950 (Cap 137)

s 7(2)

Cases Cited (4)

MY (4)

[1995] 1 MLJ 193 [2008] 7 CLJ 60 [2017] MLJU 2248 [2021] MLJU 1925

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ba-12a-33-07-2025)