SAUJANA TRIANGLE SDN BHD v 1. ) Armanee Terrace Joint Management Body 2. ) ASHOK KUMAR A/L JAYANTILAL 3. ) CELESTINE TS VINCENT 4. ) NIK AHMAD NAJIB BIN NIK ABDULLAH 5. ) VINCENT CHOY 6. ) YASMIN BT YUSOF 7. ) JULIA BIN BAHARUDDIN 8. ) ANAND RAJASINGHAM

b-02nccw-1627-08-2022 Court of Appeal (Mahkamah Rayuan) 11 August 2025 • B-02(NCC)(W)-1627-08/2022 • 3 min read

Catchwords

Dispute between Appellant/developer and the Joint Management Body and office bearers/Respondents - denial of access by the Respondents - Appellant unable to complete utility works for Tower B timeously - payment of LAD - loss of sales and rental income - torts of unlawful conspiracy and unlawful interference with business - whether there was a breach of statutory duties by the JMB under the Strata Management Act 2013 - whether the Appellant's action was defeated by the principle of res judicata - whether loss and damage proved - nominal damages.

Practice Areas

Dispute between Appellant/developer and the Joint Management Body and office bearers/Respondents

Judges (3)

Collin Lawrence Sequerah Coram Lim Hock Leng Delivered Ravinthran a/l Paramaguru Coram

Parties (9)

SAUJANA TRIANGLE Sdn Bhd Appellant Anand Rajasingham Respondent Armanee Terrace Joint Management Body Respondent Ashok Kumar a/l Jayantilal Respondent Celestine Ts Vincent Respondent Julia bin Baharuddin Respondent Nik Ahmad Najib bin Nik Abdullah Respondent Vincent Choy Respondent Yasmin bt Yusof Respondent

Case Significance

SAUJANA TRIANGLE SDN BHD v 1. ) Armanee Terrace Joint Management Body 2. ) AS... is a Court of Appeal (Mahkamah Rayuan) decision dated August 11, 2025 (citation: b-02nccw-1627-08-2022). The panel comprised Collin Lawrence Sequerah, Lim Hock Leng and Ravinthran a/l Paramaguru, with Lim Hock Leng delivering the judgment.

What was the outcome of SAUJANA TRIANGLE SDN BHD v 1. ) Armanee Terrace Joint Management Body 2. ) AS...?

SAUJANA TRIANGLE SDN BHD v 1. ) Armanee Terrace Joint Management Body 2. ) AS... is a Court of Appeal decision dated August 11, 2025. The case was heard by Collin Lawrence Sequerah. See the full judgment for details.