Energiser Properties Sdn Bhd v 1. ) GOH CHIN YANG 2. ) GOH CHIN SIANG 3. ) TEH YONG WEI 4. ) HO HEE KOK 5. ) CHONG CHOON LING 6. ) JASTACO SDN BHD 7. ) NMC PROPERTY MANAGEMENT SDN BHD 8. ) WHC DEVELOPMENT SDN BHD 9. ) LOW YUAN HENG 10. ) CHEN KEE HENG 11. ) CHEN KEE YONG 12. ) LIM WEI TSAIR 13. ) WONG BAN YEE, BENEDICT 14. ) TAN BEE GEOK 15. ) TOON PECK YEE 16. ) ESSEN-HAUS SDN. BHD. 17. ) SOON HIN 18. ) LOONG CHEE HOW 19. ) YYP PROPERTY SDN BHD 20. ) LIEW YUNG PIAO 21. ) MAH YING YING 22. ) ...

a-02ncvcw-106-01-2023 Court of Appeal (Mahkamah Rayuan) 6 September 2023 • A-02(NCvC)(W)-106-01/2023

Catchwords

Section 73 Courts of Judicature Act 1964 - Appeal not to operate as stay of execution - Section 44 Courts of Judicature Act 1964 - Incidental directions and interim orders - Rule 13 Rules of Court of Appeal 1994 - Stay of proceedings on appeal – Trite law of legal burden to show special circumstances to justify the grant of a stay of execution - Reasons must be deposed in the affidavit filed in support of the application - No special circumstance to justify an unconditional stay

Practice Areas

Section 73 Courts of Judicature Act 1964

Judges (3)

Azmi bin Ariffin Coram Lee Swee Seng Delivered Mariana binti Haji Yahya Coram

Parties (37)

ACFIRST CERAMICS Sdn Bhd Respondent AIE HOLDING Sdn Bhd Respondent AVERTEC Sdn Bhd Respondent ESSEN-HAUS Sdn Bhd Respondent Energiser Properties Sdn Bhd Appellant JASTACO Sdn Bhd Respondent LIM WT PAEDIATRICS Sdn Bhd Respondent NMC PROPERTY MANAGEMENT Sdn Bhd Respondent WHC DEVELOPMENT Sdn Bhd Respondent YYP PROPERTY Sdn Bhd Respondent Chen Kee Heng Respondent Chen Kee Yong Respondent Chern Gark Lin Respondent Chin Kim Yew Respondent Chong Choon Ling Respondent Choong Khong Neng Respondent Goh Chin Siang Respondent Goh Chin Yang Respondent Ho Hee Kok Respondent Hon Kah Soon Respondent Khor Lee Pang Respondent Kok Chea Fong Respondent Lai Lee Buay Respondent Lee Chun Teik Respondent Liew Yung Piao Respondent Lim Kok Seong Respondent Lim Wei Tsair Respondent Loong Chee How Respondent Low Yuan Heng Respondent Mah Ying Ying Respondent Soon Hin Respondent Tan Bee Geok Respondent Tan Tiua Huat Respondent Teh Yong Wei Respondent Toon Peck Yee Respondent Wong Ban Yee, Benedict Respondent Yee Yoke Chek Respondent

Case Significance

Energiser Properties Sdn Bhd v 1. ) GOH CHIN YANG 2. ) GOH CHIN SIANG 3. ) TE... is a Court of Appeal (Mahkamah Rayuan) decision dated September 6, 2023 (citation: a-02ncvcw-106-01-2023). The panel comprised Azmi bin Ariffin, Lee Swee Seng and Mariana binti Haji Yahya, with Lee Swee Seng delivering the judgment.

What was the outcome of Energiser Properties Sdn Bhd v 1. ) GOH CHIN YANG 2. ) GOH CHIN SIANG 3. ) TE...?

Energiser Properties Sdn Bhd v 1. ) GOH CHIN YANG 2. ) GOH CHIN SIANG 3. ) TE... is a Court of Appeal decision dated September 6, 2023. The case was heard by Azmi bin Ariffin. See the full judgment for details.