1. ) TAN HAN KWAN 2. ) TAN MEI LI 3. ) TAN SU LI v 1. ) BLUEFIRE DEVELOPMENT SDN BHD 2. ) CH'NG KONG SAN

22ncc-200-06-2014 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 14 June 2023 • 22NCC-200-06/2014 • 13 min read
3 cases cited (0 SG, 3 foreign)

Outcome

For the reasons stated above, I allowed this Application, with no order as to costs.

Quoted verbatim from the judgment of High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) (22ncc-200-06-2014). Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal for the complete decision.

Catchwords

Committal Proceedings - Setting Aside Ex Parte Leave Order - Order 42 Rule 13 Rules of Court 2012 - Order 52 Rule 3(2) - Expert Evidence - Order 40A Rule 3 - Non-compliance with procedural requirements - Full and frank disclosure - Prima facie case - Fabricated evidence allegations - Technical matters requiring trial - Subsequent trial findings cannot cure defects - Academic nature of proceedings - Wee Choo Keong principle - Contempt must be purged before matter can proceed/trial - Procedural integrity - Temporal disconnect in evidence – Committal Ex parte leave applications requiring strict compliance

Practice Areas

Civil Procedure Criminal Procedure

Judges (1)

Wan Muhammad Amin bin Wan Yahya Delivered

Counsel (7)

Cheang & Ariff Firm Chris Lim Su Heng Firm Andrew Fernandez Counsel Defendant Anson Chee Weng Kian Counsel Defendant Ng Yong Yee Counsel Plaintiff Ooi Chih-Jen Counsel Plaintiff Yap Tat Sing Counsel Plaintiff

Parties (5)

BLUEFIRE DEVELOPMENT Sdn Bhd Defendant Ch'ng Kong San Defendant Tan Han Kwan Plaintiff Tan Mei Li Plaintiff Tan Su Li Plaintiff

Statutes Cited

Rules of Court 2012

Cases Cited (3)

MY (3)
[1993] 3 CLJ 210 [2013] 5 MLJ 541 [2020] 4 MLJ 773

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (22ncc-200-06-2014)