ASPALELA BINTI RAMLY v DR. TAWFIQUE HASAN CHOWDHURY

12a-13-02-2021 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 25 April 2021 • 12A-13-02/2021

Catchwords

Defamation suit-striking out-pleadings in defamation cases not complied with-specific words alleged to be defamatory must be set out in order for defence to know defences that can be relied on-pleadings must disclose a cause of action in defamation-defamatory meanings imputed by impugned words must be pleaded

Practice Areas

Defamation suit-striking out-pleadings in defamation cases not complied with-specific words alleged to be defamatory must be set out in order for defence to know defences that can be relied on-pleadings must disclose a cause of action in defamation-defamatory meanings imputed by impugned words must be pleaded

Judges (1)

Alice Loke Yee Ching Delivered

Parties (2)

Aspalela binti Ramly Plaintiff Dr. Tawfique Hasan Chowdhury Defendant

Case Significance

ASPALELA BINTI RAMLY v DR. TAWFIQUE HASAN CHOWDHURY is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated April 25, 2021 (citation: 12a-13-02-2021). The case was decided by Alice Loke Yee Ching.

What was the outcome of ASPALELA BINTI RAMLY v DR. TAWFIQUE HASAN CHOWDHURY?

ASPALELA BINTI RAMLY v DR. TAWFIQUE HASAN CHOWDHURY is a High Court decision dated April 25, 2021. The case was heard by Alice Loke Yee Ching. See the full judgment for details.