1. ) NG HOE KEONG 2. ) DEVANDRAN A/L ARUMUGAM 3. ) SUN MARINE COATING (M) SDN BHD 4. ) SYAHIRAH BINTI SAHARUDIN 5. ) THEVAGAR A/L GURUNATHAN v 1. ) OAG ENGINEERING SDN BHD 2. ) OAG OFFSHORE PIPELINE SERVICES SDN BHD 3. ) OAG INTERNATIONAL PIPELINE SERVICES LTD-ABU CH 4. ) OAG INTERNATIONAL PIPELINE LTD 5. ) SETIA OFFSHORE SERVICES SDN BHD

08i-67-03-2021w Federal Court (Mahkamah Persekutuan) 14 March 2022 • 08(i)-67-03/2021(W)

Catchwords

Courts of Judicature Act 1964 – Preliminary Objection – application under subsection 97(4) to discharge the decision of a single Judge under subsection 97(3) – whether burden is on the applicant to show reason.

Practice Areas

Courts of Judicature Act 1964

Judges (3)

Hasnah binti Dato' Mohammed Hashim Coram Rhodzariah binti Bujang Coram Zaleha binti Yusof Delivered

Parties (10)

OAG ENGINEERING Sdn Bhd Respondent OAG INTERNATIONAL PIPELINE LTD Respondent OAG INTERNATIONAL PIPELINE SERVICES LTD-ABU CH Respondent OAG OFFSHORE PIPELINE SERVICES Sdn Bhd Respondent SETIA OFFSHORE SERVICES Sdn Bhd Respondent SUN MARINE COATING Sdn Bhd Applicant Devandran a/l Arumugam Applicant Ng Hoe Keong Applicant Syahirah binti Saharudin Applicant Thevagar a/l Gurunathan Applicant

Case Significance

1. ) NG HOE KEONG 2. ) DEVANDRAN A/L ARUMUGAM 3. ) SUN MARINE COATING (M) SDN... is a Federal Court (Mahkamah Persekutuan) decision dated March 14, 2022 (citation: 08i-67-03-2021w). The panel comprised Hasnah binti Dato' Mohammed Hashim, Rhodzariah binti Bujang and Zaleha binti Yusof, with Zaleha binti Yusof delivering the judgment.

What was the outcome of 1. ) NG HOE KEONG 2. ) DEVANDRAN A/L ARUMUGAM 3. ) SUN MARINE COATING (M) SDN...?

1. ) NG HOE KEONG 2. ) DEVANDRAN A/L ARUMUGAM 3. ) SUN MARINE COATING (M) SDN... is a Federal Court decision dated March 14, 2022. The case was heard by Hasnah binti Dato' Mohammed Hashim. See the full judgment for details.