PERAK INTEGRATED NETWORK SERVICES SDN BHD v 1. ) PINS OSC & MAINTENANCE SERVICES SDN BHD 2. ) URBAN DOMAIN SDN BHD

03-6-08-2024w Federal Court (Mahkamah Persekutuan) 28 January 2026 • 03-6-08/2024(W) • 62 min read
35 cases cited (4 SG, 31 foreign)

Catchwords

Whether a winding up of a company after a liability Judgment in its favour but before assessment of quantum would limit the quantum to until the winding up date - whether the Issue of winding up should be raised in the Liability Appeal and not in the Quantum Appeal on ground of res judicata - whether an extension of the agreement that happened after the Liability Judgment but before assessment of Quantum may be considered - whether the court in interpreting a Judgment may take the background facts of the case, the pleadings and relief claimed and the grounds of Judgment as well as the changed circumstances into consideration without being inconsistent with the Liability Judgment.

Practice Areas

Whether a winding up of a company after a liability Judgment in its favour but before assessment of quantum would limit the quantum to until the winding up date

Judges (3)

Ahmad Terrirudin bin Mohd Salleh Coram Lee Swee Seng Delivered Rhodzariah binti Bujang Coram

Parties (3)

PERAK INTEGRATED NETWORK SERVICES Sdn Bhd Appellant PINS OSC & MAINTENANCE SERVICES Sdn Bhd Respondent URBAN DOMAIN Sdn Bhd Respondent

Case Significance

PERAK INTEGRATED NETWORK SERVICES SDN BHD v 1. ) PINS OSC & MAINTENANCE SERVI... is a Federal Court (Mahkamah Persekutuan) decision dated January 28, 2026 (citation: 03-6-08-2024w). <p>This appeal was heard together with two related appeals in the PINS OSC joint-venture dispute, concerning the assessment of quantum after a prior finding of liability. The Federal Court examined whether a court interpreting a judgment may consider background facts, pleadings, and changed circumstances without contradicting the earlier liability finding. The case involved a derivative action brought by Urban Domain on behalf of the wound-up joint-venture company.</p> The panel comprised Ahmad Terrirudin bin Mohd Salleh, Lee Swee Seng and Rhodzariah binti Bujang, with Lee Swee Seng delivering the judgment.

Summary

This appeal was heard together with two related appeals in the PINS OSC joint-venture dispute, concerning the assessment of quantum after a prior finding of liability. The Federal Court examined whether a court interpreting a judgment may consider background facts, pleadings, and changed circumstances without contradicting the earlier liability finding. The case involved a derivative action brought by Urban Domain on behalf of the wound-up joint-venture company.

What was the outcome of PERAK INTEGRATED NETWORK SERVICES SDN BHD v 1. ) PINS OSC & MAINTENANCE SERVI...?

<p>This appeal was heard together with two related appeals in the PINS OSC joint-venture dispute, concerning the assessment of quantum after a prior f...

Statutes Cited

Companies Act 2016 (Cap 777)
Rules of Court 2012

Cases Cited (35)

SLR (4)
[1988] 1 SLR(R) 631 [2007] 2 SLR(R) 770 [2015] 5 SLR 1 [2022] 1 SLR 302
UK (14)
[1966] 2 All ER 536 [1991] 2 AC 93 [1991] 3 All ER 41 [2001] 1 All ER 481 [2001] UKHL 34 [2002] 2 AC 1 [2007] 2 AC 353 [2011] 1 WLR 2900 [2012] UKPC 6 [2013] EWHC 3556 [2015] 3 All ER 1082 [2015] UKSC 36 [2022] EWHC 243 [2023] EWCA Civ 1289
MY (17)
[1981] 1 MLJ 143 [1986] 1 MLJ 494 [1995] 3 MLJ 189 [1996] 2 MLJ 34 [1996] 3 MLJ 547 [1996] 4 CLJ 155 [2000] 2 CLJ 833 [2000] 2 MLJ 353 [2001] 4 MLJ 346 [2009] 2 MLJ 660 [2010] 2 MLJ 181 [2016] 1 CLJ 177 [2016] 1 MLJ 464 [2018] 2 MLJ 133 [2018] 5 MLJ 204 [2019] 2 MLJ 689 [2021] 4 MLJ 354