Tindak Murni Sdn Bhd v Juang Setia Sdn Bhd

03-2-11-2018b Federal Court (Mahkamah Persekutuan) 18 September 2019 • 03-2-11/2018(B)

Catchwords

Arbitration - Arbitration Act 2005, s10 - whether the arbitration agreement or the proceedings in court obtained despite the agreement to arbitrate took precedence - can judgment in default be sustained when party is bound by valid arbitration clause - whether court should consider the merits or existence of disputes raised by defendant in hearing the application to set aside JID where parties are bound by valid arbitration clause - whether court could intervene dispute between parties who had agreed on arbitration clause

Practice Areas

Arbitration

Judges (5)

Abdul Rahman bin Sebli Coram Azahar bin Mohamed Coram Nallini Pathmanathan Coram Tengku Maimun binti Tuan Mat Delivered Vernon Ong Lam Kiat Coram

Parties (2)

Juang Setia Sdn Bhd Respondent Tindak Murni Sdn Bhd Appellant

Case Significance

Tindak Murni Sdn Bhd v Juang Setia Sdn Bhd is a Federal Court (Mahkamah Persekutuan) decision dated September 18, 2019 (citation: 03-2-11-2018b). The panel comprised Abdul Rahman bin Sebli, Azahar bin Mohamed, Nallini Pathmanathan, Tengku Maimun binti Tuan Mat and Vernon Ong Lam Kiat, with Tengku Maimun binti Tuan Mat delivering the judgment.

What was the outcome of Tindak Murni Sdn Bhd v Juang Setia Sdn Bhd?

Tindak Murni Sdn Bhd v Juang Setia Sdn Bhd is a Federal Court decision dated September 18, 2019. The case was heard by Abdul Rahman bin Sebli. See the full judgment for details.