1. ) GOLDEN STAR 2. ) Ding Toh Biew 3. ) Ding Toh Gien 4. ) Ding Toh Lei v 1. ) LING PEEK HOE 2. ) LING BOON HUAT

02f-60-10-2023a Federal Court (Mahkamah Persekutuan) 24 March 2024 • 02(f)-60-10/2023(A)

Catchwords

The parties in these appeals unfortunately have quite a long chequered litigation history between them spanning over 17 years – see decision of the Federal Court in Ling Peek Hoe & Anor v Ding Siew Ching & Ors [2017] 7 CLJ 641 [Federal Court]. Ultimately, after succeeding in proving that the appellants had defrauded them into parting with their properties, the properties were returned to the respondents. Because the High Court had also ordered that damages be assessed by the Registrar, the parties were back before the High Court on that assessment of damages. These appeals arise from the damages that were assessed.

Practice Areas

The parties in these appeals unfortunately have quite a long chequered litigation history between them spanning over 17 years

Judges (3)

Abu Bakar bin Jais Coram Harmindar Singh Dhaliwal Coram Mary Lim Thiam Suan Delivered

Parties (6)

Ding Toh Biew Appellant Ding Toh Gien Appellant Ding Toh Lei Appellant Golden Star Appellant Ling Boon Huat Respondent Ling Peek Hoe Respondent

Case Significance

1. ) GOLDEN STAR 2. ) Ding Toh Biew 3. ) Ding Toh Gien 4. ) Ding Toh Lei v 1.... is a Federal Court (Mahkamah Persekutuan) decision dated March 24, 2024 (citation: 02f-60-10-2023a). The panel comprised Abu Bakar bin Jais, Harmindar Singh Dhaliwal and Mary Lim Thiam Suan, with Mary Lim Thiam Suan delivering the judgment.

What was the outcome of 1. ) GOLDEN STAR 2. ) Ding Toh Biew 3. ) Ding Toh Gien 4. ) Ding Toh Lei v 1....?

1. ) GOLDEN STAR 2. ) Ding Toh Biew 3. ) Ding Toh Gien 4. ) Ding Toh Lei v 1.... is a Federal Court decision dated March 24, 2024. The case was heard by Abu Bakar bin Jais. See the full judgment for details.