1. Far East Holdings Bhd 2. Kampong Aur Oil Palm Sdn Bhd ... Appellants v Majlis Ugama Islam dan Adat Resam Melayu Pahang ... Respondent

02-19-04-2016 Federal Court (Mahkamah Persekutuan) 14 November 2017 • 02-19-04/2016

Catchwords

Arbitration — Appeal — Award — Setting aside final award — Grounds for the court’s intervention — Whether award manifestly unlawful and unconscionable — Whether arbitrator adopted proper approach in construing agreement — Whether arbitrator committed any error of law in construing agreement — Whether there was need to intervene as to method adopted by arbitrator to assess value of shares — Whether arbitrator erred in awarding pre and post award interest— Arbitration Act 1952 [Act 93- now repealed by Act 646], section 24; Arbitration Act 2005 [Act 646], section 37(1), section 42 (1) and (1A)

Practice Areas

Arbitration

Judges (5)

Azahar bin Mohamed Coram Jeffrey Tan Kok Wha Coram Ramly bin Haji Ali Coram Seri Zulkefli bin Ahmad Makinudin Delivered Zaharah binti Ibrahim Coram

Parties (3)

Far East Holdings Bhd Appellant Kampong Aur Oil Palm Sdn Bhd ... Appellants Appellant Majlis Ugama Islam dan Adat Resam Melayu Pahang ... Respondent Respondent

Case Significance

1. Far East Holdings Bhd 2. Kampong Aur Oil Palm Sdn Bhd ... Appellants v Maj... is a Federal Court (Mahkamah Persekutuan) decision dated November 14, 2017 (citation: 02-19-04-2016). The panel comprised Azahar bin Mohamed, Jeffrey Tan Kok Wha, Ramly bin Haji Ali, Seri Zulkefli bin Ahmad Makinudin and Zaharah binti Ibrahim, with Seri Zulkefli bin Ahmad Makinudin delivering the judgment.

What was the outcome of 1. Far East Holdings Bhd 2. Kampong Aur Oil Palm Sdn Bhd ... Appellants v Maj...?

1. Far East Holdings Bhd 2. Kampong Aur Oil Palm Sdn Bhd ... Appellants v Maj... is a Federal Court decision dated November 14, 2017. The case was heard by Azahar bin Mohamed. See the full judgment for details.