res judicata
4 cases · August 2025 to December 2025
Key Issues & Sub-Topics
Interlocutory order — Stay order not appealed — Whether subsequent application to set aside constitutes re-litigation — Abuse of process — Principle of finality. 1 Whether previous suit involving same parties and subject matter bars current claim — Identity of issues and parties — Whether insurers are privies to insured in earlier suit 1 breached the rule of natural justice — 2ND SET ASIDE THE FINAL AWARD — section 42 of the Arbitration Act 2005 — section 37 of the Arbitration Act 2005 — setting aside Application against an arbitral award can only enquire into the decision-making process of the arbitrator and not the decision in and of itself — section 37 of the Arbitration Act 2005 — Res ipsa of a ‘jurisdictional challenge’ — right to be heard in limine — term “public policy” within section 37 (1)(b)(ii) of the Arbitration Act 2005 — principle of estoppel per rem judicatam (or res judicata) — estoppel 1 Striking out — Plaintiffs memfailkan saman pemula baharu berhubung hak milikan dan injunksi ke atas hartanah yang sama yang telah diputuskan dalam prosiding terdahulu — Isu dan pihak-pihak adalah sama — Tindakan baharu terhalang oleh prinsip res judicata — Litigasi berganda menyalahi prinsip finality of litigation — Mahkamah menegaskan bahawa Aturan 18 r.19(1)(b) & (d) Kaedah-Kaedah Mahkamah 2012 membolehkan pliding dibatalkan jika ia remeh, menyusahkan atau suatu penyalahgunaan proses — Permohonan Defendan dibenarkan, saman pemula dibatalkan dengan kos. 1
Interlocutory order — Stay order not appealed — Whether subsequent application to set aside constitutes re-litigation — Abuse of process — Principle of finality. 1 case
Whether previous suit involving same parties and subject matter bars current claim — Identity of issues and parties — Whether insurers are privies to insured in earlier suit 1 case
breached the rule of natural justice — 2ND SET ASIDE THE FINAL AWARD — section 42 of the Arbitration Act 2005 — section 37 of the Arbitration Act 2005 — setting aside Application against an arbitral award can only enquire into the decision-making process of the arbitrator and not the decision in and of itself — section 37 of the Arbitration Act 2005 — Res ipsa of a ‘jurisdictional challenge’ — right to be heard in limine — term “public policy” within section 37 (1)(b)(ii) of the Arbitration Act 2005 — principle of estoppel per rem judicatam (or res judicata) — estoppel 1 case
Striking out — Plaintiffs memfailkan saman pemula baharu berhubung hak milikan dan injunksi ke atas hartanah yang sama yang telah diputuskan dalam prosiding terdahulu — Isu dan pihak-pihak adalah sama — Tindakan baharu terhalang oleh prinsip res judicata — Litigasi berganda menyalahi prinsip finality of litigation — Mahkamah menegaskan bahawa Aturan 18 r.19(1)(b) & (d) Kaedah-Kaedah Mahkamah 2012 membolehkan pliding dibatalkan jika ia remeh, menyusahkan atau suatu penyalahgunaan proses — Permohonan Defendan dibenarkan, saman pemula dibatalkan dengan kos. 1 case
Key Statutes
Arbitration Act 2005 (Cap 646)
cited in 2 cases Arbitration
Act 2005
cited in 1 case English Arbitration Act 1950
cited in 1 case Insolvency Act
1986
cited in 1 case Companies Act
2016
cited in 1 case Companies Act 2016 (Cap 777)
cited in 1 case Insolvency Act 1967 (Cap 360)
cited in 1 case Court Distribution
Key People & Firms
Top Judges
Top Firms
Cases
n-02imncvc-1761-10-2024
1. ) HASHIM BIN ABD RAZAK 2. ) MAIMON BINTI ABDUL RAZAK 3. ) ZAINAH MAHANI BINTI ABD RAZAK v PEMBINAAN PD JAYA SDN. BHD. (Dalam Likuidasi)
14 December 2025
MYCOA
wa-22ncvc-174-03-2025
1. ) GENERALI INSURANCE MALAYSIA BERHAD 2. ) TAKAFUL IKHLAS GENERAL BERHAD 3. ) SS MOTOR CENTURY SDN. BHD. v 1. ) WAWASAN SINAR GEMILANG SDN. BHD. 2. ) Kua Guan Chai 3. ) Phun Booi Mooi
7 October 2025
MYHC
b-02ca-2128-12-2023
ONE AMERIN RESIDENCE SDN BHD v RAGAWANG CORPORATION SDN BHD
3 September 2025
MYCOA
ja-24ncvc-1541-12-2024
1. ) LIM SEH MOI 2. ) CHEE SIEW CHOO v MOHD KHAIRUDIN BIN HASSAN
20 August 2025
MYHC