O18

3 cases · May 2025 to July 2025

Key Issues & Sub-Topics

Pembatalan — kesan Penghakiman Persetujuan — Penghakiman Persetujuan yang menjadi teras bantahan kepada permohonan ini jelas bertujuan untuk menyesaikan semua pertikaian dan ianya meliputi apa-apa tindakan yang bersabit kepada harta pesaka arwah Haji Hussein oleh kedua-dua pihak — persetujuan ini menjadikan isu antara pihak-pihak telah res judicata — permohonan dibenarkan. 1 validity of Power of Attorney — loan agreement — limitation — Money Lending transaction — fraud and unlawful and/or lawful conspiracy to injure — application allowed 1 Plaintiff OS is to nullify a High Court order — no appeal — Application to strike out was allowed — I understand the Plaintiff's predicament and dissatisfaction with the HC order dated 27.4.2018, specifically on paragraph c, which puts the Plaintiff in an awkward position. The land was transferred back to the Plaintiff due to a fraudulent transaction, but the charge was declared valid — I am of the opinion that the prayers in the OS were to declare and set aside an order of a High Court which are coordinate jurisdiction with this Court. It is settled law that a High Court cannot set aside a final order regularly obtained from another High Court of concurrent jurisdiction — the proper recourse would be that the Plaintiff should have appealed on that particular portion of the order to the Court of Appeal, then. 1

Pembatalan — kesan Penghakiman Persetujuan — Penghakiman Persetujuan yang menjadi teras bantahan kepada permohonan ini jelas bertujuan untuk menyesaikan semua pertikaian dan ianya meliputi apa-apa tindakan yang bersabit kepada harta pesaka arwah Haji Hussein oleh kedua-dua pihak — persetujuan ini menjadikan isu antara pihak-pihak telah res judicata — permohonan dibenarkan. 1 case

ba-24ncvc-2529-11-2024 FAISAL @ AHMAD FAISAL BIN HUSSAIN v Ahmad Fikri Bin Hussein (Selaku Pentadbir Harta Pusaka Simati, Hussein Bin Yaacob)

validity of Power of Attorney — loan agreement — limitation — Money Lending transaction — fraud and unlawful and/or lawful conspiracy to injure — application allowed 1 case

ba-22ncvc-459-11-2024 1. ) FLORIE PHILOMINA A/P S G DORAI RAJ 2. ) ABDUL OOVAISE BIN M MOHAMED IQBAL v 1. ) KAVITA A/P J S ANANDAM 2. ) NIK NUR SYARLIN BINTI NIK ISMAIL

Plaintiff OS is to nullify a High Court order — no appeal — Application to strike out was allowed — I understand the Plaintiff's predicament and dissatisfaction with the HC order dated 27.4.2018, specifically on paragraph c, which puts the Plaintiff in an awkward position. The land was transferred back to the Plaintiff due to a fraudulent transaction, but the charge was declared valid — I am of the opinion that the prayers in the OS were to declare and set aside an order of a High Court which are coordinate jurisdiction with this Court. It is settled law that a High Court cannot set aside a final order regularly obtained from another High Court of concurrent jurisdiction — the proper recourse would be that the Plaintiff should have appealed on that particular portion of the order to the Court of Appeal, then. 1 case

ba-24ncvc-1437-07-2024 WASEEM YAQOOB S/O SHEIKH MUHAMMAD YAQOOB v 1. ) MAYBANK ISLAMIC BERHAD 2. ) RTL VISAGE SDN BHD

Court Distribution

Key People & Firms

Top Judges

Noor Hayati binti Haji Mat 3

Cases

ba-24ncvc-2529-11-2024

FAISAL @ AHMAD FAISAL BIN HUSSAIN v Ahmad Fikri Bin Hussein (Selaku Pentadbir Harta Pusaka Simati, Hussein Bin Yaacob)

ba-22ncvc-459-11-2024

1. ) FLORIE PHILOMINA A/P S G DORAI RAJ 2. ) ABDUL OOVAISE BIN M MOHAMED IQBAL v 1. ) KAVITA A/P J S ANANDAM 2. ) NIK NUR SYARLIN BINTI NIK ISMAIL

ba-24ncvc-1437-07-2024

WASEEM YAQOOB S/O SHEIKH MUHAMMAD YAQOOB v 1. ) MAYBANK ISLAMIC BERHAD 2. ) RTL VISAGE SDN BHD