Interlocutory appeal
3 cases · January 2025 to September 2025
Key Issues & Sub-Topics
Civil Procedure — Amendment — Statement of claim amended without leave — Amendment filed before pleadings deemed to be closed — Amendment made at an early stage of proceeding — Whether regular and in order — Application to disallow amendment made without leave — No cogent grounds — Non-appearance of solicitor during hearing — Appeal dismissed — Order 20 Rule 3 & 4 of the Rules of Court 2012 1 Civil Procedure — Summary judgment — Loan agreement — Recovery of loan sum — Whether there were triable issues — Whether the loan was disbursed — Whether action filed within time limitation — Accrual of cause of action — Whether the calculation interest is correct — Appeal dismissed — Magistrate’s decision affirmed — Order 14 Rule 1 of the Rules of Court 2012 1 For a detention and/or preservation of the sum of RM350,000.00 to be paid by the second defendant to the plaintiff in the Session Court Ampang within 7 days from the date of the Order — Whether the balance of convenience lies in allowing the preservation order — Whether there is a serious issue to be tried — The plaintiff and the 1st defendant executed a Joint Venture Agreement to purchase a 48-acre land at Pandan Perdana — The plaintiff paid the money into the second defendant’s account at the request of the first defendant — The second defendant acknowledged the payment and subsequently pay the money to the first defendant — The first defendant denied the plaintiff’s allegation regarding the payment sum RM350,000.00. 1
Civil Procedure — Amendment — Statement of claim amended without leave — Amendment filed before pleadings deemed to be closed — Amendment made at an early stage of proceeding — Whether regular and in order — Application to disallow amendment made without leave — No cogent grounds — Non-appearance of solicitor during hearing — Appeal dismissed — Order 20 Rule 3 & 4 of the Rules of Court 2012 1 case
Civil Procedure — Summary judgment — Loan agreement — Recovery of loan sum — Whether there were triable issues — Whether the loan was disbursed — Whether action filed within time limitation — Accrual of cause of action — Whether the calculation interest is correct — Appeal dismissed — Magistrate’s decision affirmed — Order 14 Rule 1 of the Rules of Court 2012 1 case
For a detention and/or preservation of the sum of RM350,000.00 to be paid by the second defendant to the plaintiff in the Session Court Ampang within 7 days from the date of the Order — Whether the balance of convenience lies in allowing the preservation order — Whether there is a serious issue to be tried — The plaintiff and the 1st defendant executed a Joint Venture Agreement to purchase a 48-acre land at Pandan Perdana — The plaintiff paid the money into the second defendant’s account at the request of the first defendant — The second defendant acknowledged the payment and subsequently pay the money to the first defendant — The first defendant denied the plaintiff’s allegation regarding the payment sum RM350,000.00. 1 case
Court Distribution
Key People & Firms
Top Judges
Cases
ba-12ancvc-35-06-2025
VICTOR GOH v LOW WEE FOOK
22 September 2025
MYHC
ba-11ancc-1-02-2025
1. ) RAGUNATH A/L MOHUN 2. ) PARVATI A/P PERUMAL v PERBADANAN TABUNG PEMBANGUNAN KEMAHIRAN (PTPK)
20 May 2025
MYHC
ba-12ancvc-60-11-2024
ECOSEAL RESOURCES SDN. BHD v TAZALIZAH BINTI ABIDIN TALIB
12 January 2025
MYHC