CONTRACT: Breach of contract

3 cases · March 2025 to September 2025

Key Issues & Sub-Topics

Allegation of deficient performance and third party involvement as breach — No breach proven — Termination of contract — Whether contract can be terminated — No complaint of performance-related basis — Different reasons for termination — Contract unlawfully terminated 1 Joint Venture agreement — Reciprocal contractual obligations — Allegation of failure to incorporate a joint venture company and advance funds within the agreed timeline — Waiver of the alleged breach — Acceptance of delayed performance — Counterclaim for breach — Failure to utilise the sum paid in accordance with the joint venture agreement — Privity of contract — Damages 1 Fraud — Conspiracy to injure — Contract for glove supplies — Quality of the gloves ordered and supplied — Whether Plaintiff was supplied what it had ordered — Whether fraud was perpetrated by the Defendants — Whether there was a conspiracy between Defendants — Whether corporate veil should be lifted — Counterclaim for balance payment and commissions — Admissibility of documents — Section 73A(2) of the Evidence Act 1950 1

Joint Venture agreement — Reciprocal contractual obligations — Allegation of failure to incorporate a joint venture company and advance funds within the agreed timeline — Waiver of the alleged breach — Acceptance of delayed performance — Counterclaim for breach — Failure to utilise the sum paid in accordance with the joint venture agreement — Privity of contract — Damages 1 case

ba-22ncvc-223-06-2022 TP3 RESOURCES SDN. BHD. v 1. ) HAU MUN MENG 2. ) TP3 RESOURCES SDN BHD (Defendan dalam tuntutan balas) 3. ) Raja Shazreen Petra Binti Raja Azman Shah (Defendan Dalam Tuntutan Balas) 4. ) Raja Iman Petra Bin Raja Azman Shah (Defendan Dalam Tuntutan Balas) 5. ) Asia Gate Sdn Bhd (Defendan dalam Tuntutan Balas)

Fraud — Conspiracy to injure — Contract for glove supplies — Quality of the gloves ordered and supplied — Whether Plaintiff was supplied what it had ordered — Whether fraud was perpetrated by the Defendants — Whether there was a conspiracy between Defendants — Whether corporate veil should be lifted — Counterclaim for balance payment and commissions — Admissibility of documents — Section 73A(2) of the Evidence Act 1950 1 case

ba-22ncvc-501-12-2021 NEO ALCHEMY BUILD INDIA LLP v 1. ) KAH GLOVE SDN BHD 2. ) TAH KOK HUA @ KEN 3. ) CHA WEI WEI @ VIVIAN 4. ) ANG SOON THYE

Court Distribution

Key People & Firms

Top Judges

Elaine Yap Chin Gaik 3

Cases

ba-22ncvc-85-02-2024

BROGASS (M) SDN. BHD. v GENERACRES SDN. BHD.

25 September 2025

ba-22ncvc-223-06-2022

TP3 RESOURCES SDN. BHD. v 1. ) HAU MUN MENG 2. ) TP3 RESOURCES SDN BHD (Defendan dalam tuntutan balas) 3. ) Raja Shazreen Petra Binti Raja Azman Shah (Defendan Dalam Tuntutan Balas) 4. ) Raja Iman Petra Bin Raja Azman Shah (Defendan Dalam Tuntutan Balas) 5. ) Asia Gate Sdn Bhd (Defendan dalam Tuntutan Balas)

ba-22ncvc-501-12-2021

NEO ALCHEMY BUILD INDIA LLP v 1. ) KAH GLOVE SDN BHD 2. ) TAH KOK HUA @ KEN 3. ) CHA WEI WEI @ VIVIAN 4. ) ANG SOON THYE