Zulkifly bin Mohd Zainal

Person 1 case

Zulkifly bin Mohd Zainal appeared as a party in the following Malaysia court case:

ba-22m-182-06-2024

PMB TIJARI BERHAD v 1. ) HAMZA SUPPLY & SERVICES SDN BHD 2. ) HAMZA MOTORS SDN. BHD. 3. ) NIK IRUWAN BIN NIK IZANI 4. ) ZULKIFLY BIN MOHD ZAINAL

MYHC 19 August 2025

See the full case for complete details including judgment text, legal issues, and counsel involved.

About Zulkifly bin Mohd Zainal

Zulkifly bin Mohd Zainal appears as a party in 1 judgment in the MY Case Law database, spanning August 2025 to August 2025. Zulkifly bin Mohd Zainal appeared as defendant in 1 case. Cases span the High Court (1).

How many court cases involve Zulkifly bin Mohd Zainal?

Zulkifly bin Mohd Zainal appears in 1 published judgment from August 2025 to August 2025. Most commonly as defendant (1 cases).

Practice Areas

Application for Summary Judgment- Defendants have no defence to the claim- indebtedness is clearly established on the documentary record- Defendants’ failure to file any Affidavit in Reply amounts to an admission of the facts- Defendants oppose the application- the claim is premature- Plaintiff is estopped from relying on the procedural default because of ongoing settlement negotiations between the parties- filing an Affidavit in Reply was unnecessary- the claim is premature and should be tested at trial with oral evidence- non-filing of the Affidavit is an irregularity under Order 2 rule 1 ROC 2012, not a nullity, and that the Court may cure it in the interest of justice under Order 92 rule 4 ROC 2012- For estoppel to arise, there must be a clear and unequivocal representation or course of conduct which the other party relied upon to their detriment-it is unsupported by affidavit- without affidavit support, there is no admissible basis to find that the Plaintiff waived its procedural rights or is estopped from relying on the Defendants’ default-it is a bare assertion- the discretion to cure such non-compliance is exercised upon affidavit evidence explaining the default and showing a defence on the merits- Plaintiff has discharged its burden to show a prima facie case- Defendants, having filed no Affidavit in Reply, have failed to raise any bona fide triable issue on admissible evidence- the Defendants have no defence to the Plaintiff’s claim- the Plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment. 1

Defendant (1)

ba-22m-182-06-2024 MYHC

PMB TIJARI BERHAD v 1. ) HAMZA SUPPLY & SERVICES SDN BHD 2. ) HAMZA MOTORS SDN. BHD. 3. ) NIK IRUWAN BIN NIK IZANI 4. ) ZULKIFLY BIN MOHD ZAINAL

19 August 2025