O
Ooi Kim Geik
Person 2 cases
About Ooi Kim Geik
Ooi Kim Geik appears as a party in 2 judgments in the MY Case Law database, spanning June 2025 to November 2025. Ooi Kim Geik appeared as aggrieved party in 1 case, defendant in 1 case. Cases span the High Court (2).
How many court cases involve Ooi Kim Geik?
Ooi Kim Geik appears in 2 published judgments from June 2025 to November 2025. Most commonly as aggrieved party (1 cases).
Practice Areas
TRIAL: The plaintiff’s claim against the defendant is founded on fraud and breach of fiduciary duty. The deceased, Ng Kin Yong, who was the managing director, was in control of Nation Park in terms of overall management and decision-making, including finance 1 CIVIL LAW: Whether the plaintiff’s claim is barred by limitation 1 EVIDENCE LAW: Admissibility of Part C documents in Court 1 EVIDENCE LAW: Burden of Proof 1 Application for leave to pursue appeal in the name of company—Section 486(2) Companies Act 2016—Company in compulsory liquidation—Official Receiver declining to pursue appeal—Court’s discretion—Applicable threshold—Whether proposed appeal has probable or at least arguable chance of success—Whether appeal frivolous, vexatious or oppressive—Whether continuation of proceedings in interests of company or creditors—Underlying action alleging misappropriation of company funds by deceased director dismissed—Findings of fact and credibility against company—Unreliable and altered accounting records—Failure to prove personal receipt or wrongful appropriation—Rejection of documentary evidence—Section 90A Evidence Act 1950—Limitation—Knowledge of alleged withdrawals long before suit commenced—Appellate restraint against interference with factual findings—Proposed appeal amounting to re-litigation—Underlying suit found to be mala fide—Absence of exceptional circumstances justifying further proceedings—Speculative prospect of recovery insufficient—Official Receiver’s refusal and lack of creditor support relevant—Costs and delay militating against appeal—Leave refused—Consequential application to appoint solicitors dismissed—Costs awarded personally against contributory. 1