Muhammad Firdaus Akmal bin Abd Razak

Person 1 case

Muhammad Firdaus Akmal bin Abd Razak appeared as a party in the following Malaysia court case:

ca-12b-18-12-2024

1. ) MUHAMMAD FIRDAUS AKMAL BIN ABD RAZAK 2. ) RUHANI BINTI JUSOH v 1. ) SABRI BIN SEBOK 2. ) MOHD QAYYUM BIN MOHD KHALID

MYHC 24 September 2025

See the full case for complete details including judgment text, legal issues, and counsel involved.

About Muhammad Firdaus Akmal bin Abd Razak

Muhammad Firdaus Akmal bin Abd Razak appears as a party in 1 judgment in the MY Case Law database, spanning September 2025 to September 2025. Muhammad Firdaus Akmal bin Abd Razak appeared as appellant in 1 case. Cases span the High Court (1).

How many court cases involve Muhammad Firdaus Akmal bin Abd Razak?

Muhammad Firdaus Akmal bin Abd Razak appears in 1 published judgment from September 2025 to September 2025. Most commonly as appellant (1 cases).

Practice Areas

The appeal before this court is the Plaintiffs’ appeal against the entirety of the findings on liability and part of the findings on quantum while the 2nd Defendant cross-appeal is on liability of parties. Briefly, Plaintiffs’ claim arises from a road traffic accident that occurred involving three (3) vehicles between Plaintiffs, 1st Defendant & 2nd Defendant. Consent judgment was recorded between the Plaintiffs and the 1st Defendant without admission of liability while Plaintiffs continued their claim solely against the 2nd Defendant. The 2nd Defendant closed his case without calling any witnesses or giving evidence himself. In upholding the decision of Learned Sessions Court Judge and dismisses both Plaintiffs’ appeal and the 2nd Defendant’s cross-appeal, it was held that failure to adduce evidence is not synonymous with admission of claim and that Plaintiffs must first establish liability before any burden shifts to the defendant. In addition to that, a consent judgment cannot erase the fact that an accident occurred and that the 1st Defendant was involved. In deciding the quantum of damages, the awards given are well reasoned, proportionate and firmly anchored in both evidential valuation as well as legal principles. Hence, both appeals dismissed. 1

Appellant (1)

ca-12b-18-12-2024 MYHC

1. ) MUHAMMAD FIRDAUS AKMAL BIN ABD RAZAK 2. ) RUHANI BINTI JUSOH v 1. ) SABRI BIN SEBOK 2. ) MOHD QAYYUM BIN MOHD KHALID

24 September 2025