Low Cheng Teik

Person 2 cases

About Low Cheng Teik

Low Cheng Teik appears as a party in 2 judgments in the MY Case Law database, spanning August 2024 to April 2025. Low Cheng Teik appeared as aggrieved party in 1 case, appellant in 1 case. Cases span the Federal Court (1), High Court (1).

How many court cases involve Low Cheng Teik?

Low Cheng Teik appears in 2 published judgments from August 2024 to April 2025. Most commonly as aggrieved party (1 cases).

Practice Areas

whether a shareholder’s complaint is actionable by way of an oppression action or a derivative action 1 the distinction between an oppression action and a derivative action 1 the historical origins of oppression actions and derivative actiond 1 the rule against reflective loss 1 Section 346 and Section 347 Companies Act 2016 1 the proper plaintiff rule 1 the majority rule principle 1 Leave to intervene in judicial management proceeding-Section 410(c) Companies Act 2016-application to strike out JM application-whether proposed interveners are entitled to intervene in the JM application-whether JM application should be struct out at this stage-whether leave to be granted-basis to intervene-creditors of the company with existing or pending legal claims-the outcome of the JM application will affect their rights and remedies-Applicant contends that unsecured creditors are not entitled to intervene or be heard in JM applications-relied on Desa Tiasa case-proposed intervener argued that Desa Tiasa has no binding effect as it has no written judgment-appellate court decision which has not supported by written grounds cannot be treated as binding precedent-a number of High Court decisions allowed unsecured creditors to intervene in JM application-no provision in the CA 2016 or the Companies (Corporate Rescue Mechanism) Rules 2018 that limits intervention to unsecured creditors-the nature of JM application justifies access to affected parties-reinforced the objectives of JM application-each proposed interveners has a legitimate legal interest in the outcome of the JM application-rights of creditors-whether secured or unsecured-clearly affected by the outcome of the JM application-proposed interveners are allowed to intervene in the JM application-striking out application will be dealt with the JM application. 1

Aggrieved Party (1)

ba-28jm-18-08-2024 MYHC

ACE HOLDINGS BERHAD PENCELAH 1. ) KOPERASI PERMODALAN FELDA MALAYSIA 2 BERHAD 2. ) MOHD NADZRI BIN ZAINAL ABIDIN 3. ) DATUK FAIZAN BIN ABDUL RAHMAN 4. ) NABISHAH BINTI MOHAMAD 5. ) KOPERASI TELEKOM PAHANG BERHAD 6. ) ZARINA BINTI AHMAD 7. ) ZAMIL BIN AHMAD 8. ) ARINDERPREET KAUR A/P MANJIT SINGH 9. ) JASBIR KAUR A/P MITT SINGH 10. ) TIJWANT SINGH A/L JARNAIL SINGH 11. ) DELVINDER SINGH MANN A/L MANJIT SINGH 12. ) MANJIT SINGH A/L DELBARA SINGH 13. ) HALIMAH BINTI MUHABAH 14. ) ROKAYAH BINTI M...

10 April 2025

Appellant (1)

02f-30-04-2023w MYFC

1. ) LOW CHENG TEIK 2. ) LOW HOCK BOON 3. ) LAW SEE YOONG 4. ) SNE MARKETING SDN BHD v LOW EAN NEE

27 August 2024