Husin bin Yahya

Person 1 case

Husin bin Yahya appeared as a party in the following Malaysia court case:

wa-22ncc-442-09-2020

1. ) MANJUNG AQUATIC SDN BHD (DALAM LIKUIDASI) 2. ) MANJUNG AQUA FARMING SDN BHD v 1. ) MOHAMAD ZAHID BIN PUTERA 2. ) HUSIN BIN YAHYA 3. ) YONG KWAI HEONG 4. ) YONG WEI JIEN 5. ) EMPEROR MARINE SEAFOOD SDN BHD 6. ) PELANTAR CERGAS (M) SDN BHD 7. ) ADIL JUTA SDN BHD 8. ) GIGIH MUDA SDN BHD 9. ) SITIAWAN HATCHERY SDN BHD

MYHC 11 August 2025

See the full case for complete details including judgment text, legal issues, and counsel involved.

About Husin bin Yahya

Husin bin Yahya appears as a party in 1 judgment in the MY Case Law database, spanning August 2025 to August 2025. Husin bin Yahya appeared as defendant in 1 case. Cases span the High Court (1).

How many court cases involve Husin bin Yahya?

Husin bin Yahya appears in 1 published judgment from August 2025 to August 2025. Most commonly as defendant (1 cases).

Practice Areas

assessment of damages-consent judgment-assessment of damages and account for profits-special damages must be specifically pleaded-claim for diminution in the share value is barred by the “reflective loss” principle-general damages and an account of profits are alternative remedies and the aggrieved party is required to elect which remedy to pursue-no action lies at the suit of a member suing in that capacity to make good a diminution in the value of his shareholding, where it is merely a reflection of the loss suffered by the company-a plaintiff can obtain Judgment for both general damages and an account of profits but he must at execution stage elect which to enforce-order granting the respondent both damages and an account of profits had to be set aside. The respondent would have to elect the one or the other-a party should in general not be required to elect between remedies unless and until he was able to make an informed choice-the authorities make it clear that damages and an account of profits are alternative remedies and the aggrieved party is required to elect which remedy to pursue-A corporate plaintiff cannot be granted aggravated damages-only two categories where exemplary damages can be awarded. The two categories are-oppressive, arbitrary or unconstitutional action by the servants of the Government; or-where the defendant’s conduct has been calculated by him to make a profit for himself which may well exceed the compensation payable to the plaintiff’- 1

Defendant (1)

wa-22ncc-442-09-2020 MYHC

11 August 2025