Haji Abdul Rahman bin Mat Yasin

Person 1 case

Haji Abdul Rahman bin Mat Yasin appeared as a party in the following Malaysia court case:

wa-12bncc-32-09-2023

1. ) APLI BIN YUSOFF 2. ) HAJI ABDUL RAHMAN BIN MAT YASIN 3. ) RAMLEE BIN SAIDIN 4. ) SINCERE PROGRESS SDN BHD v 1. ) Abdul Malik Bin Dasthigeer 2. ) Siadali Bin Mohd Abu Bakkar

MYHC 5 March 2025

See the full case for complete details including judgment text, legal issues, and counsel involved.

About Haji Abdul Rahman bin Mat Yasin

Haji Abdul Rahman bin Mat Yasin appears as a party in 1 judgment in the MY Case Law database, spanning March 2025 to March 2025. Haji Abdul Rahman bin Mat Yasin appeared as appellant in 1 case. Cases span the High Court (1).

How many court cases involve Haji Abdul Rahman bin Mat Yasin?

Haji Abdul Rahman bin Mat Yasin appears in 1 published judgment from March 2025 to March 2025. Most commonly as appellant (1 cases).

Practice Areas

The law on specific performance of an agreement is well-settled. I need only refer to just one case-It must not be forgotten that there is here a contract for the sale of immovable property. It is the kind of obligation that statute rebuttably presumes to be incapable of being remedied by an award of monetary compensation-Court of Equity is sufficiently empowered to decree specific performance on terms-There is also precedent for decreeing specific performance and then leaving it to the defendant to later apply to have the decree vacated on the ground of impossibility of performance-It is trite law that an appellate court will not readily interfere with the findings of fact arrived at by the trial court to which the law entrusts the primary task of evaluation of the evidence. The appellate court has a duty to intervene only where a trial court has so fundamentally misdirected itself, that one may say that no reasonable court which had properly directed itself and asked the correct questions would have arrived at the same conclusion-When it comes to agreement to buy shares the Court clearly can and should grant specific performance by virtue of section 11 (1)(c) illustration c of the Specific Relief Act 1950 1

Appellant (1)

wa-12bncc-32-09-2023 MYHC

1. ) APLI BIN YUSOFF 2. ) HAJI ABDUL RAHMAN BIN MAT YASIN 3. ) RAMLEE BIN SAIDIN 4. ) SINCERE PROGRESS SDN BHD v 1. ) Abdul Malik Bin Dasthigeer 2. ) Siadali Bin Mohd Abu Bakkar

5 March 2025