U
United Overseas Bank Berhad
Organisation 5 cases
About United Overseas Bank Berhad
United Overseas Bank Berhad appears as a party in 5 judgments in the MY Case Law database, spanning April 2021 to November 2025. United Overseas Bank Berhad appeared as garnishee in 2 cases, respondent in 2 cases, appellant in 1 case. Cases span the High Court (3), Federal Court (2).
How many court cases involve United Overseas Bank Berhad?
United Overseas Bank Berhad appears in 5 published judgments from April 2021 to November 2025. Most commonly as garnishee (2 cases).
In which Malaysian courts has United Overseas Bank Berhad appeared?
United Overseas Bank Berhad has appeared across High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) (3 cases) and Federal Court (Mahkamah Persekutuan) (2 cases), totaling 5 judgments.
Practice Areas
Indefeasibility of title and interest 1 This Originating Summons is an application by the Plaintiff pursuant to S.11 of the Arbitration Act 2005. 1) To restrain call on performance. 2) Conditions in Performance Bond. 3) Unconscionable conduct. 1 The Applicant is a Judgment Creditor, having secured a judgment against the Respondent in 2023, thereby rendering the Defendant a Judgment Debtor. To enforce the said judgment, the Judgment Creditor initiated garnishee proceedings against the Judgment Debtor’s accounts in 18 banks, pursuant to Order 49 of the Rules of Court 2012. However, these efforts proved futile when the High Court at Shah Alam, in Suit BA-37G-104-07/2024 (“Suit 104”), declined to grant the garnishee order absolute sought by the Plaintiff. The present dispute specifically concerns the Judgment Creditor and the Sixth Garnishee. Having successfully resisted the Judgment Creditor’s application for a garnishee order absolute before the Shah Alam High Court in Suit 104, the Sixth Garnishee now faces a fresh challenge 1 CIVIL PROCEDURE: Appeal against decision of the SAR- stay of the garnishee proceedings- Interim Maintenance Order- Variation Application at the Family Court- relevant test for a stay of proceedings- any special circumstances- rare and compelling circumstances-Child’s welfare is off paramount importance-possibility of duplicity of action leading to unnecessary possibility of differing judgments by High Courts of concurrent jurisdiction- withdrawing funds at present might interfere with future variation arrangements. 1
Garnishee (2)
ba-37g-9-01-2025 MYHC
KANYAWEE ANEKTHANABOON v LEONG WEI PIN PIHAK YANG DIGARNIS 1. ) CIMB Bank Berhad 2. ) Public Bank Berhad 3. ) Malayan Banking Berhad 4. ) Hong Leong Bank Berhad 5. ) United Overseas Bank (Malaysia) Berhad 6. ) RHB Bank Berhad
30 November 2025
ba-37g-104-07-2024 MYHC
SENG SAN BING v PETER CHARLES SMERLING PIHAK YANG DIGARNIS 1. ) AFFIN BANK BERHAD 2. ) ALLIANCE BANK MALAYSIA BERHAD 3. ) AMBANK (M) BERHAD 4. ) BANK OF AMERICA MALAYSIA BERHAD 5. ) BNP PARIBAS MALAYSIA BERHAD 6. ) CIMB BANK BERHAD 7. ) CIMB ISLAMIC BANK BERHAD 8. ) CITIBANK BERHAD 9. ) DEUTSCHE BANK (MALAYSIA) BERHAD 10. ) HONG LEONG BANK BERHAD 11. ) HSBC BANK MALAYSIA BERHAD 12. ) J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK BERHAD 13. ) MALAYAN BANKING BERHAD 14. ) OCBC BANK (MALAYSIA) BERHAD 15. ) PUBLIC BANK...
13 April 2025
Respondent (2)
ba-24carb-8-06-2025 MYHC
BGMC CORPORATION SDN BHD v 1. ) GITA KASTURI SDN. BHD. 2. ) UNITED OVERSEAS BANK (MALAYSIA) BERHAD
27 October 2025
01f-5-02-2017b-didengar-bersama-02f-8-02-2017b MYFC
1. ) 1. See Leong Chye @ Sze Leong Chye 2. See Ewe Lin 2. ) United Overseas Bank (Malaysia) Berhad v 1. ) United Overseas Bank (Malaysia) Berhad 2. ) 1. Kum Hoi Engineering Industries Sdn Bhd 2. Heveaplast Marketing Sdn. Bhd.
21 April 2021