T
TETUAN CHOW TAT SENG & LOW
Organisation 1 case
About TETUAN CHOW TAT SENG & LOW
TETUAN CHOW TAT SENG & LOW appears as a party in 1 judgment in the MY Case Law database, spanning October 2025 to October 2025. TETUAN CHOW TAT SENG & LOW appeared as defendant in 1 case. Cases span the High Court (1).
How many court cases involve TETUAN CHOW TAT SENG & LOW?
TETUAN CHOW TAT SENG & LOW appears in 1 published judgment from October 2025 to October 2025. Most commonly as defendant (1 cases).
Practice Areas
1. This is a somewhat unusual case involving the Plaintiff, who, not once but twice, advanced substantial loans to the First Defendant. The Plaintiff has instituted the present action against both the First and Second Defendants, the First Defendant being a partner in the Second Defendant firm. 1 2. The present application, encapsulated in Enclosure 8, is the Defendants application for the Second Defendant to be struck out as a party pursuant to Order 18 rule 19(1) of the Rules of Court 2012. This Court dismissed the Defendants’ application for the Second Defendant to be struck out as a party after a hearing on 27 October 2025. 1 3. Notwithstanding the clear wording of section 68(1)(f) of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964, which provides that no appeal shall lie to the Court of Appeal where a High Court has dismissed an application to strike out any writ or pleading, the First Defendant filed a Notice of Appeal on 24 November 2025. 1 4. While it may be contended that an appeal in such circumstances is statutorily impermissible and liable to be dismissed at the threshold, the First Defendant will undoubtedly rely on the recent decision of the Federal Court in MT Ventures Sdn Bhd v QM Print Sdn Bhd and Another Appeal 2025 6 MLRA 595; 2025 6 MLJ 471; 2025 7 AMR 573; 2025 9 CLJ 560 to advance the argument that not every unsuccessful applicant in a striking-out application is necessarily precluded from pursuing an appeal to the Court of Appeal. The question of whether the present appeal falls within any of the permissible circumstances delineated by the Federal Court is ultimately a matter for determination by the Court of Appeal. 1 5. The present concern of this Court is confined to Enclosure 8, and these are the grounds of decision of this Court in dismissing Enclosure 8. 1