S

STANDARD CHARTERED BANK MALAYSIA BERHAD

Organisation 4 cases

About STANDARD CHARTERED BANK MALAYSIA BERHAD

STANDARD CHARTERED BANK MALAYSIA BERHAD appears as a party in 4 judgments in the MY Case Law database, spanning March 2025 to January 2026. STANDARD CHARTERED BANK MALAYSIA BERHAD appeared as defendant in 1 case, garnishee in 1 case, intervener in 1 case. Cases span the High Court (3), Court of Appeal (1).

How many court cases involve STANDARD CHARTERED BANK MALAYSIA BERHAD?

STANDARD CHARTERED BANK MALAYSIA BERHAD appears in 4 published judgments from March 2025 to January 2026. Most commonly as defendant (1 cases).

Practice Areas

The Applicant is a Judgment Creditor, having secured a judgment against the Respondent in 2023, thereby rendering the Defendant a Judgment Debtor. To enforce the said judgment, the Judgment Creditor initiated garnishee proceedings against the Judgment Debtor’s accounts in 18 banks, pursuant to Order 49 of the Rules of Court 2012. However, these efforts proved futile when the High Court at Shah Alam, in Suit BA-37G-104-07/2024 (“Suit 104”), declined to grant the garnishee order absolute sought by the Plaintiff. The present dispute specifically concerns the Judgment Creditor and the Sixth Garnishee. Having successfully resisted the Judgment Creditor’s application for a garnishee order absolute before the Shah Alam High Court in Suit 104, the Sixth Garnishee now faces a fresh challenge 1 Section 366 & 368 Companies Act 2016 1 Issues: (i) whether revised scheme is different and containing better particulars; (ii) whether particulars in revised scheme contains sufficient information for leave to be granted; and (iii) whether the Interveners' opposition to the application relevant to the determination whether leave ought to be granted 1 Findings: (i) revised scheme was not substantially different from previous scheme; (ii) revised scheme did not contain enough information and particulars to explain how the scheme will be executed and how funds will be raised to pay liabilities; (iii) the secured and unsecured creditors opposition to the revised scheme indicates the sentiment that will be carried to the creditors meeting and therefore the application is futile since the applicants will not be able to secure 75% votes of creditors present at the creditors' meeting. 1 Held: Application dismissed. 1 Originating Summons for an order for sale pursuant to section 256 of the National Land Code 1 BANKING LAW: Banker's duty of care to customer 1 CONTRACT LAW: Express and implied terms in banking contracts 1

Respondent (1)

w-02a-1711-10-2024 MYCOA

RAJESWARY A/P S.MUTHUSAMY v 1. ) STANDARD CHARTERED BANK MALAYSIA BERHAD 2. ) Shanmugam A/l Ramachandran

Defendant (1)

wa-22ncc-231-05-2022 MYHC

PAX INVESTMENTS LIMITED v STANDARD CHARTERED BANK MALAYSIA BERHAD

Garnishee (1)

ba-37g-104-07-2024 MYHC

SENG SAN BING v PETER CHARLES SMERLING PIHAK YANG DIGARNIS 1. ) AFFIN BANK BERHAD 2. ) ALLIANCE BANK MALAYSIA BERHAD 3. ) AMBANK (M) BERHAD 4. ) BANK OF AMERICA MALAYSIA BERHAD 5. ) BNP PARIBAS MALAYSIA BERHAD 6. ) CIMB BANK BERHAD 7. ) CIMB ISLAMIC BANK BERHAD 8. ) CITIBANK BERHAD 9. ) DEUTSCHE BANK (MALAYSIA) BERHAD 10. ) HONG LEONG BANK BERHAD 11. ) HSBC BANK MALAYSIA BERHAD 12. ) J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK BERHAD 13. ) MALAYAN BANKING BERHAD 14. ) OCBC BANK (MALAYSIA) BERHAD 15. ) PUBLIC BANK...

Intervener (1)

ma-24ncc-4-07-2024 MYHC

1. ) IMPONOTIVE AUTO SDN BHD 2. ) KUASA WAJA AUTOMOBILE (M) SDN BHD 3. ) LTB MARKETING SDN BHD 4. ) S.P.A. AUTO GROUP (M) SDN BHD 5. ) S.P.A. HOTEL SDN BHD 6. ) S.P.A. SUPREME HOLDINGS (M) SDN BHD 7. ) SUPREME POWER AUTO SDN BHD 8. ) SUPREME POWER MARKETING (M) SDN BHD 9. ) SUPREME POWER PERFORMANCE (M) SDN BHD PENCELAH 1. ) OCBC Bank (Malaysia) Berhad 2. ) OCBC Al-Amin Bank Berhad 3. ) Kerajaan Malaysia 4. ) Standard Chartered Bank Malaysia Berhad 5. ) AFFIN BANK BERHAD 6. ) Tetuan Kartika &...