MA HOA TRADING CO. LTD
About MA HOA TRADING CO. LTD
MA HOA TRADING CO. LTD appears in 3 reported Malaysia court cases (2024–2025). MA HOA TRADING CO. LTD is recorded as Appellant (1) and Respondent (2). These cases were heard before MYHC (2) and MYCOA (1).
On the court record
Illustrates how the trade-description and customs regimes apply to goods in transit and to the forfeiture of seized consignments bound for a foreign destination.
Ma Hoa Trading Co. Ltd appears in the reported judgments as a company involved in a customs and trade-description dispute over seized goods, litigated before the Court of Appeal (Mahkamah Rayuan) and the High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi), with the prosecuting authority appearing as Pendakwa Raya (the Public Prosecutor). The matters concern the seizure and forfeiture of goods said to bear a false trade description.
The core question, on appeal, was whether an offence had been committed under section 5(1)(c) of the Trade Descriptions Act 2011 read with section 6(1)(g) of the same Act — whether the company was a person who exposed for supply, or had in its possession, custody or control for supply, cigarettes bearing a false trade description. A distinct and significant issue was whether cigarettes that were goods in transit and transshipment, en route to a third-party consignee in the Philippines, could be subject to seizure and forfeiture enforcement under section 47 of the Trade Descriptions Act 2011. That question goes to the territorial reach of trade-description enforcement over goods merely passing through Malaysia.
The related High Court decisions, framed partly in Malay, arose from an appeal from the Sessions Court in a matter brought by the domestic-trade ministry, concerning a seizure of twenty-one containers of cigarettes bearing a particular trade description. The court's disposition was recorded in the court's own words — Rayuan dibenarkan, 21 kontena dikembalikan kepada KPDN (the appeal was allowed, and the twenty-one containers were returned to the ministry) — engaging the Trade Descriptions Act 2011, the Trade Marks Act 2019 and the Customs Act 1967, and the disposal of seized goods without a prosecution. Across the matters, the company illustrates how the trade-description and customs regimes apply to goods in transit and to the forfeiture of seized consignments, and the limits of enforcement over goods bound for a foreign destination.
How many Malaysia court cases involve MA HOA TRADING CO. LTD?
MA HOA TRADING CO. LTD appears in 3 reported Malaysia court cases (2024–2025).
Which courts does MA HOA TRADING CO. LTD appear in?
MA HOA TRADING CO. LTD appears before MYHC (2) and MYCOA (1).
What trade-description question did the Court of Appeal consider?
Whether the company committed an offence under section 5(1)(c) read with section 6(1)(g) of the Trade Descriptions Act 2011 by exposing for supply or possessing cigarettes bearing a false trade description, and whether cigarettes in transit and transshipment to a consignee in the Philippines could be seized and forfeited under section 47 of the Act.
What was the recorded disposition in the related appeal?
The court recorded, in its own words, that the appeal was allowed and the twenty-one containers were returned to the ministry — Rayuan dibenarkan, 21 kontena dikembalikan kepada KPDN — engaging the Trade Descriptions Act 2011, the Trade Marks Act 2019 and the Customs Act 1967.