I
Inter Formula Sdn Bhd
Organisation 2 cases
About Inter Formula Sdn Bhd
Inter Formula Sdn Bhd appears as a party in 2 judgments in the MY Case Law database, spanning May 2025 to September 2025. Inter Formula Sdn Bhd appeared as appellant in 1 case, respondent in 1 case. Cases span the High Court (2).
How many court cases involve Inter Formula Sdn Bhd?
Inter Formula Sdn Bhd appears in 2 published judgments from May 2025 to September 2025. Most commonly as appellant (1 cases).
Practice Areas
1. The Appellant/Plaintiff’s main grievance arose from an Unless Order issued by the Sessions Court, requiring the payment of security for costs into court. As the Appellant/Plaintiff has since deposited the sum of RM20,000.00 as ordered, the Respondent/Defendant contended that the appeal has been rendered academic. However, this Court is inclined to agree with the Appellant/Plaintiff that the central issue, namely, whether it was proper for the Sessions Court to impose an Unless Order in the context of a security for costs application, remains a live and justiciable question. 1 The Core Issues 1 2. This appeal raises two issues. The first concerns whether an order for security for costs ought to be granted. The second and more crucial issue is whether the Sessions Court’s order in paragraph (d), described by the Appellant/Plaintiff as “draconian”, is permissible within the context of a security for costs application. 1 This is an appeal by EUM Realty Sdn Bhd, the Third Defendant in the Sessions Court, pursuant to Order 55 rule 5 of the Rules of Court 2012, against the decision of the learned Sessions Court Judge in dismissing its application in Enclosure 19 with costs in the cause. Enclosure 19 at the Sessions Court was premised on Order 33 rule 2 and/or Order 15 rule 6 and/or Order 18 rule 19(1) of the Rules of Court 2012. The primary issue in this appeal is whether the Sessions Court had erred in law and/or in fact in dismissing the Appellant’s Notice of Application in Enclosure 19. 1