Tetralina Bin Ahmed Fauzi
About Tetralina Bin Ahmed Fauzi
Tetralina Bin Ahmed Fauzi appears as counsel of record in 4 reported Malaysia judgments (2025). These were heard before MYCOA (4).
On the court record
The reported matter documents prosecution advocacy in a multi-accused culpable-homicide appeal, grounded in the Court of Appeal judgment.
Tetralina Bin Ahmed Fauzi appears in the reported corpus as counsel for the prosecution in a homicide matter that reached the Court of Appeal, where several accused, tried together, brought separate appeals against conviction and sentence. The charge was culpable homicide not amounting to murder under section 304(a) of the Penal Code, read together with section 34, the provision that fixes each participant with responsibility for a criminal act done in furtherance of a common intention. Appearing for the prosecution across the related appeals, the task was to defend the convictions entered against the several accused.
The prosecution's position in such a case rests on two connected propositions: that a criminal act caused the death, and that each accused shared the common intention that draws him into liability under section 34. On appeal, the state must show that the trial court was entitled to find both elements against each appellant on the evidence, notwithstanding the individualised challenges the defence raises to separate one accused from the group.
The evidential record described the finding of the deceased, the arrival of the investigating officer and forensic personnel, and the post-mortem examination, so the appeals turned on how far that circumstantial and forensic material sustained the convictions. A thread running through the matter is the state's defence of a joint-liability homicide conviction, where the prosecution must uphold both the causal act and the shared intention against appeals brought individually by each accused. The reported work is thus in serious criminal appellate practice on the prosecution side, argued before the Court of Appeal of Malaysia in appeals against conviction and sentence for culpable homicide under section 304(a) of the Penal Code, an offence carrying a substantial custodial term that places real weight on the sufficiency of the proof against each appellant and on the coherence of the common-intention case advanced against the group.
How many cases has Tetralina Bin Ahmed Fauzi appeared in?
Tetralina Bin Ahmed Fauzi appears as counsel of record in 4 reported Malaysia judgments (2025).
Which courts does Tetralina Bin Ahmed Fauzi appear in?
Tetralina Bin Ahmed Fauzi appears before MYCOA (4).
On which side does Tetralina Bin Ahmed Fauzi's reported case place him?
He appeared for the prosecution in a homicide matter before the Court of Appeal, defending convictions for culpable homicide not amounting to murder under section 304(a) of the Penal Code read with section 34, against appeals brought by several accused.
What must the prosecution establish in a section 34 homicide case?
That a criminal act caused the death and that each accused shared the common intention that draws him into liability under section 34, so that on appeal the state must show the trial court was entitled to find both elements against each appellant.
What evidence was central to the appeals?
The record described the finding of the deceased, the arrival of the investigating officer and forensics, and the post-mortem examination, so the appeals turned on how far that circumstantial and forensic material sustained the convictions.