About Tetralina Ahmed Fauzi

Tetralina Ahmed Fauzi appears as counsel of record in 3 reported Malaysia judgments (2025–2026). These were heard before MYHC (2) and MYFC (1).

On the court record

Engages the prosecution's disclosure obligations and additional evidence under the Criminal Procedure Code, and the constitutional law of peaceful assembly under Article 10 of the Federal Constitution.

Tetralina Ahmed Fauzi's appearances in this corpus engage criminal procedure and constitutional law. As counsel for the respondent in the High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi), she acted in matters concerning pre-trial disclosure and additional evidence on appeal. The court addressed "penzahiran dokumen" (the disclosure of documents) under "Seksyen 51A Kanun Tatacara Jenayah" (section 51A of the Criminal Procedure Code), and the scope of the prosecution's duty of pre-trial disclosure — whether the prosecution is obliged to deliver all documents, or only those it intends to tender as evidence. The court also considered "keterangan tambahan dalam rayuan" (additional evidence on appeal) under section 317 of the Criminal Procedure Code, and the discretion of an appellate court to receive fresh evidence in exceptional circumstances. Those provisions define the informational fairness of a criminal trial and the narrow circumstances in which the evidential record may be supplemented after the fact.

In the Federal Court (Mahkamah Persekutuan) she acted as counsel for the respondent in a constitutional matter concerning the right to peaceful assembly. The catchwords set out the constitutional architecture: Article 10(1)(b) of the Federal Constitution guarantees the right to assemble peaceably; Article 10(2)(b) permits Parliament to impose restrictions on that right; Article 8(1) guarantees equality before the law and informs the proportionality analysis; and Article 4(1) renders void any law inconsistent with the Constitution. The concrete question concerned the requirement to give the police ten days' notice of an assembly, where the organiser had failed to give that notice, and whether such a notification requirement is a valid and proportionate restriction on the freedom of assembly.

Across these matters, Tetralina Ahmed Fauzi's practice engages the prosecution's disclosure obligations and the reception of additional evidence under the Criminal Procedure Code, and the constitutional law of peaceful assembly — the scope of the Article 10 freedom and the proportionality of statutory restrictions upon it.

3
Appearances
1
Roles
2
Firms
No
Senior Counsel

How many cases has Tetralina Ahmed Fauzi appeared in?

Tetralina Ahmed Fauzi appears as counsel of record in 3 reported Malaysia judgments (2025–2026).

Which courts does Tetralina Ahmed Fauzi appear in?

Tetralina Ahmed Fauzi appears before MYHC (2) and MYFC (1).

What criminal-procedure questions arose in the High Court?

The scope of the prosecution's pre-trial disclosure duty under "Seksyen 51A Kanun Tatacara Jenayah" (section 51A of the Criminal Procedure Code) — whether it must deliver all documents or only those it will tender — and the reception of additional evidence on appeal under section 317.

What constitutional question did the Federal Court matter engage?

The right to peaceful assembly under Article 10(1)(b) of the Federal Constitution, the permissible restrictions under Article 10(2)(b), and whether the requirement to give the police ten days' notice of an assembly was a valid and proportionate restriction, assessed with Articles 8(1) and 4(1).

Practice Areas (from case appearances)

Counsel Respondent (3)