Ng Pau Chze
About Ng Pau Chze
Ng Pau Chze appears as counsel of record in 4 reported Malaysia judgments (2024–2025). These were heard before MYHC (3) and MYCOA (1).
On the court record
The reported matters document trademark-opposition and corporate-governance work, grounded in High Court and Court of Appeal judgments.
Ng Pau Chze's reported matters are strongly concentrated in trademark and intellectual-property litigation, with company-law work alongside, argued in the High Court and the Court of Appeal. A recurring pattern is the opposition to a trademark registration. In one matter an internationally known manufacturer opposed the registration of a mark and, its opposition having been dismissed by the Registrar, brought the question to the High Court; appearing for the plaintiff, the Court held that the defendant's mark was not confusingly similar and was not likely to deceive or cause confusion, found no error by the Registrar and dismissed the originating summons with costs. In a further opposition brought by a well-known energy-drink company, the point taken was whether the non-filing of a statutory declaration was fatal to the applicant's case; appearing for the plaintiff, the Court again found no error by the Registrar and dismissed the originating summons with costs.
Trademark work also reaches the appellate level. In a Court of Appeal matter concerning opposition to a registration, the questions were first use of the mark in Malaysia and whether use by a related or associated company conferred a right on the appellant to register the mark itself; appearing for the respondent, the Court dismissed the appeal with costs of RM20,000.
Company law completes the profile. In a High Court matter on corporate governance and the removal of directors, the issues were statutory compliance with sections 206 and 322 of the Companies Act 2016 and whether the required twenty-eight days' special notice had been given; appearing for the defendants, the Court allowed a stay of execution pending the appeal to the Court of Appeal. A thread across these decisions is the protection and contest of registered rights and corporate office, argued in the High Court and before the Court of Appeal of Malaysia.
How many cases has Ng Pau Chze appeared in?
Ng Pau Chze appears as counsel of record in 4 reported Malaysia judgments (2024–2025).
Which courts does Ng Pau Chze appear in?
Ng Pau Chze appears before MYHC (3) and MYCOA (1).
What is the focus of Ng Pau Chze's reported cases?
They are concentrated in trademark and intellectual-property litigation, including several oppositions to trademark registration, together with company-law work on the removal of directors under the Companies Act 2016.
How did the High Court treat the trademark oppositions?
In the reported oppositions the Court held that the defendant's mark was not confusingly similar or likely to deceive, found no error by the Registrar and dismissed the originating summonses with costs; he appeared for the plaintiffs.
What was the company-law question about removal of directors?
Whether there was statutory compliance with sections 206 and 322 of the Companies Act 2016, including the required twenty-eight days' special notice, in a matter where he appeared for the defendants and a stay of execution was allowed pending appeal.