L

Low Wei Loke

Shaharuddin Hidayu & Marwaliz Hisyam Teh Wong Kian Kheong Called to the Bar in 2013 8 appearances

About Low Wei Loke

Low Wei Loke has appeared as counsel in 8 judgments in the MY Case Law database, spanning February 2025 to November 2025. Role breakdown: counsel for appellant (6), counsel accused (2). Appearances span the Federal Court (5), Court of Appeal (3). Admitted to the Malaysian Bar on 2013-12-06.

Case areas include Appeal against conviction and sentence (3 cases), Whether an express remand order is required under section 96(3) of the Armed Forces Act 1972. (2 cases), Once there is an allegation of unlawful detention, the burden shifts to the detaining authority to show that the detention was made under a valid legal power (2 cases).

8

Appearances

2013

Year of Call

3

Firms

No

Senior Counsel

How many court cases has Low Wei Loke appeared in?

Low Wei Loke has appeared in 8 published judgments from February 2025 to November 2025. Appearances span the Federal Court (5), Court of Appeal (3).

What law firm does Low Wei Loke practice at?

Low Wei Loke has 8 published court appearances from February 2025 to November 2025. No firm affiliation is recorded in the database.

Practice Areas (from case appearances)

Appeal against conviction and sentence 3 Whether an accused person, upon being investigated under the Armed Forces Act 1972 and where the charge is not dealt with summarily, be remanded automatically under section 96(3) of the said Act without having to consider the remand procedures prescribed under section 94 of the Act and rules 4,15(1), 15(2), 16(1), and 38(1) of the Armed Forces (Court-Martial) Rules of Procedure 1976, with regard to remand pending trial by a Court Martial 2 Whether an express remand order is required under section 96(3) of the Armed Forces Act 1972. 2 Once there is an allegation of unlawful detention, the burden shifts to the detaining authority to show that the detention was made under a valid legal power 2 Beban pembuktian 3 elemen di bawah seksyen 300 (c) Kanun Keseksaan. 2 Sama ada kecederaan terhadap si mati tersebut mencukupi pada lazimnya untuk menyebabkan kematian? 2 Maksud frasa ‘mencukupi pada lazimnya menyebabkan kematian’ atau dalam Bahasa Inggerisnya, ‘sufficient in ordinary course of nature to cause death’ 2 Intipati kesalahan di bawah seksyen 304(a) Kanun Keseksaan 2

Counsel Appellant (6)

01f-29-09-2024d MYFC

MUHAMMAD MALIKI BIN ABDUL HALIM v 1. ) LEFTENAN KOLONEL-SHAIFULLIZAN BIN ABD AZIZ (PEGAWAI PEMERINTAH BATALION KE-5 REJIMEN RENJER DIRAJA) 2. ) PIHAK BERKUASA SIDANG PANGLIMA BRIGED KELAPAN INFANTRI MALAYSIA 3. ) PANGLIMA ANGKATAN TENTERA MALAYSIA 4. ) Kerajaan Malaysia

10 November 2025

01f-30-09-2024d MYFC

MUHAMMAD MALIKI BIN ABDUL HALIM v 1. ) LEFTENAN KOLONEL-SHAIFULLIZAN BIN ABD AZIZ (PEGAWAI PEMERINTAH BATALION KE-5 REJIMEN RENJER DIRAJA) 2. ) PIHAK BERKUASA SIDANG PANGLIMA BRIGED KELAPAN INFANTRI MALAYSIA 3. ) PANGLIMA ANGKATAN TENTERA MALAYSIA 4. ) Kerajaan Malaysia

10 November 2025

05l-30-03-2024a MYFC

YONG CHOO KIONG v Pendakwa Raya

30 September 2025

w-05sh-555-11-2023 MYCOA

SYED SADDIQ BIN SYED ABDUL RAHMAN v Pendakwa Raya

w-05sh-556-11-2023 MYCOA

SYED SADDIQ BIN SYED ABDUL RAHMAN v Pendakwa Raya

w-05sh-557-11-2023 MYCOA

SYED SADDIQ BIN SYED ABDUL RAHMAN v Pendakwa Raya

Counsel Accused (2)

05m-103-07-2024w MYFC

1. ) MUHAMMAD AKMAL ZUHAIRI BIN AZMAL 2. ) MUHAMMAD AZAMUDDIN BIN MAD SOFI 3. ) MUHAMMAD NAJIB BIN MOHD RAZI 4. ) MUHAMMAD AFIF NAJMUDIN BIN AZAHAT 5. ) MOHAMAD SHOBIRIN BIN SABRI v Pendakwa Raya [Timbalan Pendakwa Raya (TPR), Jabatan Peguam Negara]

27 February 2025

05m-107-07-2024w MYFC

ABDOUL HAKEEM BIN MOHD ALI v Pendakwa Raya [Timbalan Pendakwa Raya (TPR), Jabatan Peguam Negara]

27 February 2025