A

Ameerul Radzi bin Azlan

Rama-Rozi & Assoc. Rama-Rozi & Associates Called to the Bar in 2017 4 appearances

About Ameerul Radzi bin Azlan

Ameerul Radzi bin Azlan appears as counsel of record in 4 reported Malaysia judgments (2025). These were heard before MYHC (2) and MYFC (2).

On the court record

Ameerul Radzi bin Azlan's reported practice runs across personal-injury appeals, construction disputes and serious criminal defence, and it reaches from the Sessions Court on appeal up to the Federal Court. Many of the judgments are delivered in Bahasa Malaysia, and he acts for appellants, defendants and accused persons.

On the personal-injury side, he appeared in a road-accident appeal on both liability and quantum, where the Sessions Court had fixed liability entirely on the defendant; on appeal the apportionment was varied to fifty per cent against the plaintiff and fifty per cent against the defendant, with the assessed damages maintained on that revised basis.

His construction work includes a full-trial dispute concerning Silverpack Sdn Bhd, in which he acted for a defendant, arising from an alleged breach of a construction contract where there was no written agreement; the court held that the plaintiff had not proved its claim on the balance of probabilities and dismissed both the claim and the first defendant's counterclaim.

Most strikingly, he appears at the Federal Court in criminal defence. Acting for the accused, he was engaged on appeals concerning the elements of "seksyen 300(c) Kanun Keseksaan" (section 300(c) of the Penal Code) — in particular whether the injury inflicted was "mencukupi pada lazimnya menyebabkan kematian" (sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to cause death) — and the boundary with the lesser offence under "seksyen 304(a)" (culpable homicide not amounting to murder), including the ingredient of abetment. The practice pairs civil compensation and construction work with apex-court criminal appeals, moving between quantum and liability questions in accident claims and the fine distinctions of the law of homicide. It is a practice equally at home in the Bahasa Malaysia judgments of the accident and construction courts and in apex-court argument over what turns an unlawful killing into murder. The through-line is careful attention to proof — of liability, of loss, and of the ingredients of a serious charge.

4
Appearances
2017
Year of Call
2
Firms
No
Senior Counsel

How many cases has Ameerul Radzi bin Azlan appeared in?

Ameerul Radzi bin Azlan appears as counsel of record in 4 reported Malaysia judgments (2025).

Which courts does Ameerul Radzi bin Azlan appear in?

Ameerul Radzi bin Azlan appears before MYHC (2) and MYFC (2).

What areas does Ameerul Radzi bin Azlan cover in these decisions?

Personal-injury appeals, construction disputes and serious criminal defence. His matters include a road-accident appeal on liability and quantum, a construction contract dispute concerning Silverpack Sdn Bhd, and Federal Court criminal appeals on the elements of homicide under the Penal Code.

What happened in the road-accident appeal?

The Sessions Court had found the defendant wholly liable. On appeal the apportionment was varied to fifty per cent against the plaintiff and fifty per cent against the defendant, and the quantum of damages already assessed was maintained on that revised fifty-fifty basis.

What was the Federal Court criminal appeal about?

The elements of "seksyen 300(c) Kanun Keseksaan" (section 300(c) of the Penal Code) — in particular whether the injury inflicted was "mencukupi pada lazimnya menyebabkan kematian" (sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to cause death) — and the boundary with the lesser offence under "seksyen 304(a)" (culpable homicide not amounting to murder), including abetment. He acted for the accused.

Practice Areas (from case appearances)

Counsel Appellant (1)

Counsel Defendant (1)

Counsel Accused (2)