A

Abu Daud Abd Rahim

Azmi & Associates Called to the Bar in 2004 3 appearances

About Abu Daud Abd Rahim

Abu Daud Abd Rahim appears as counsel of record in 3 reported Malaysia judgments (2024–2025). These were heard before MYHC (2) and MYCOA (1).

On the court record

The reported matters span company arbitration-enforcement, contract and strata-management work, grounded in High Court and Court of Appeal judgments.

Abu Daud Abd Rahim's reported matters, argued through Messrs Azmi & Associates, cover company and arbitration-enforcement law, contract and strata management, across the High Court and the Court of Appeal. A company decision concerned an application, in the context of a company in liquidation, to proceed with an arbitration and with the enforcement of a final arbitral award, engaging the pre-condition to the grant of leave under section 486(2) of the Companies Act 2016. Appearing for the applicant, the matter turned on the balance the court strikes between the collective interests of a winding up and a party's wish to pursue and enforce an award.

Contract features in a Court of Appeal appeal where the question was whether the High Court had erred in concluding that an agreement had not been frustrated and that a particular clause had been fulfilled; appearing for the appellant, the Court was satisfied that the trial judge's factual findings were not plainly erroneous, affirmed the decision below and dismissed the appeal with costs of RM20,000.

Strata management completes the profile. In a High Court matter concerning maintenance charges and sinking-fund contributions under sections 52, 55 and 59 of the Strata Management Act 2013, the issues included the obligations of a management corporation and a developer; appearing for the plaintiff, the matter engaged the statutory machinery for funding the upkeep of a strata development. A thread across these decisions is the enforcement of obligations within corporate and communal structures, from leave to enforce an arbitral award against a company in liquidation, to the survival of a contract said to be frustrated, to the collection of maintenance charges in a strata scheme, argued in the High Court and before the Court of Appeal of Malaysia. The reported work thus spans company, contract and strata fields, grounded in the judgments.

3
Appearances
2004
Year of Call
1
Firm
No
Senior Counsel

How many cases has Abu Daud Abd Rahim appeared in?

Abu Daud Abd Rahim appears as counsel of record in 3 reported Malaysia judgments (2024–2025).

Which courts does Abu Daud Abd Rahim appear in?

Abu Daud Abd Rahim appears before MYHC (2) and MYCOA (1).

What areas of law feature in Abu Daud Abd Rahim's reported cases?

They include company and arbitration-enforcement law involving leave under section 486(2) of the Companies Act 2016, contract and frustration, and strata management under the Strata Management Act 2013.

What did the section 486(2) application concern?

An application, in the context of a company in liquidation, to proceed with an arbitration and to enforce a final arbitral award, engaging the pre-condition to the grant of leave under section 486(2) of the Companies Act 2016; he appeared for the applicant.

What did the Court of Appeal decide in the frustration appeal?

Appearing for the appellant, the Court was satisfied the trial judge's factual findings were not plainly erroneous, affirmed the decision below and dismissed the appeal with costs of RM20,000.

Practice Areas (from case appearances)

Counsel Applicant (1)

Counsel Appellant (1)

Counsel Plaintiff (1)