I
Isaacs & Tan
1 case · 3 lawyers
About Isaacs & Tan
Isaacs & Tan has appeared in 1 judgment in the MY Case Law database, spanning November 2025 to November 2025. Case appearances span the Court of Appeal (1). Role breakdown: counsel for defendant (1).
1
Cases
3
Lawyers (in cases)
1
Appearances
How many cases has Isaacs & Tan handled?
Isaacs & Tan has appeared in 1 published judgment from November 2025 to November 2025. Appearances span the Court of Appeal (1).
Practice Areas (from case appearances)
These two Appeals primarily concern preliminary issues as to the applicability and the proper interpretation of an Arbitration Clause as well as an Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause as against a third layer subcontractor who was assigned the rights and terms of a subcontract Agreement which was entered into by 1st and 2nd layers subcontractors. 1 Issue 1: Whether the Learned Judge was correct in finding that the Arbitration Clause and Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause within the 2nd Subcontract were enforceable against SKSB in view of the express incorporation and adoption of the 2nd Subcontract within the IESB LA; 1 Issue 2: Whether the Learned Judge was correct in its reading and interpretation of both the Arbitration Clause and the Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause and concluding that the reference to arbitration was only optional (not mandatory); and 1 Issue 3: Whether the Learned Judge was correct to find that Apex’s requests for extensions of time did NOT effectively denote that Apex had abandoned its right to refer the dispute to arbitration. 1 Held: Allowing Appeal 1547 and dismissing Appeal 1704 1