Striking out
15 cases · January 2025 to November 2025
Key Issues & Sub-Topics
Plaintiff claims agency commission for the sale of property — Plaintiff sues 4th defendant for conspiracy and unjust enrichment — 4th defendant is not a party to the agency agreement — Whether 4th defendant is privy to the termination of the agency agreement — Whether 4th defendant’s purchase of the Request for Proposal document from plaintiff creates any privity of contract between them — Whether 4th defendant has the right to purchase the subject property — Whether the necessary particulars of conspiracy was pleaded 1 Claim for outstanding sum arising from inter-company services — Whether the inter-company debts were mere book-keeping entries — Whether the claim is time-barred — Whether the inter-company charges are recurring — Whether running account — Whether acknowledgement of debt in the audited accounts. 1 Whether fraudulent trading — Section 540 of the Companies Act 2016 — Whether claim is time barred — Whether limitation period is postponed by fraud — Section 29 of the Limitation Act 1953 — Whether the company secretary (7th Defendant) assisted in the alleged fraud arising from preparation of the resolutions for declaration of dividend and change of directors — Whether the auditor (6th Defendant) assisted in the alleged fraud arising from audit of the financial statements — Whether unjust enrichment. 1 Plaintiffs seek to revoke the letters of administration granted to their mother and to remove her as administrator — Plaintiffs failed to issue a citation under Order 72 rule 2(3) of the Rules of Court 2012 — Whether such failure is fatal to the action — Whether the plaintiffs’ claim for salaries as directors of the family company should be made against the company, and not against the defendants — Whether the plaintiffs should be given permission to manage the family company — Whether the plaintiffs are entitled to motor vehicles belonging to the estate of the deceased. 1 Plaintiffs sue to recover property transferred to defendants — Whether action is time-barred — Whether claim is barred by laches and acquiescence — Whether plaintiffs have waived and are estopped from alleging any irregularities in the transfer of the property. 1 O.18 r.19(1) Rules of Court 2012 — Counterclaim — Misappropriation and beneficial ownership claims — Proper plaintiff rule — Foss v Harbottle — Locus standi — Counterclaim Plaintiff neither registered nor beneficial shareholder — No reflective loss — s.347 Companies Act 2016 derivative action not complied with — Express concession of no standing — Resulting trust — Alleged funding from company’s arbitration proceeds — Presumption favouring funding entity — No contemporaneous documentary proof — Registered shareholders holding shares on trust for funding entity — Fatal non-joinder — Separate legal entity — Abuse of process — Counterclaim filed reactively. 1 strata property — judicial review — professional negligence — duty of care — abuse of process — administrative law 1 Action brought by plaintiff with respect to the estate of his late mother — Plaintiff did not obtain a grant of probate or letters of administration — Whether plaintiff has locus standi — Whether any special circumstances to clothe plaintiff with locus standi qua beneficiary to preserve the deceased estate — Whether the defendants are executor de son tort for intermeddling with the deceased estate — Whether plaintiff should be appointed as administrator pendente lite. 1 First & 9th Defendant filed to strike out Plaintiff’s claim — Whether former Director has locus standi to act in a derivative action on behalf of the company — Whether the former Director has sufficient interest in continuing the claim. 1 O. 18 r. 19 Rules of Court 2012 — Privity of contract — Director not party to company contract — Representative capacity — Negotiations attributed to company not director personally — Personal liability of directors — No assumption of personal liability — Lifting of corporate veil — Not pleaded — Fraud and misrepresentation — Insufficient particularity of pleading — Agency doctrine — Not pleaded — Constructive trust — No identifiable trust property — Elements not established — Abuse of process. 1 Order 18 rule 19(1)(d) of the Rules of Court 2012 — Whether plaintiff is guilty of forum shopping — Whether plaintiff had knowledge of an earlier suit filed in the Kuala Lumpur High Court on the same subject matter — Whether plaintiff should have counterclaimed in that suit, instead of filing a new suit in the Penang High Court — Whether plaintiff’s application for transfer of this suit to the Kuala Lumpur High Court is an abuse of process of court. 1 Third party claim — Indemnity clause — Whether the 1st Defendant has relinquished all duty of care on execution of the SPA and Assignment — Whether the 1st Defendant or the third party has a duty of care to the Plaintiff — Whether the developer only responsible to parts where it has exclusive control over — Whether the third party is liable to indemnify the 1st Defendant 1 Plaintiff seeks an injunction against the defendants from breaking the foundation stones of a temple — Plaintiff also seeks a declaration that the land given by the Penang Development Corporation (“PDC”) to the Penang Hindu Endowments Board (PHEB) is meant for relocating the temple from its old site to the said land — Whether the PDC is obliged to provide an alternative site to relocate the temple from its old site to the said land — Whether the plaintiff could accept the offer of land contained in a letter from the PDC to the PHEB — Whether the PHEB’s title to the said land is defeasible. 1 Oppression claim by majority shareholders — Discussions between promoters — Arrangement during incorporation — Alleging breach of the Arrangement — Diversion of business from Company — Majority shareholders in control of the board and management — Locus standi to claim under section 346 of the Companies Act 2016 — Whether majority control is ineffective to bring to an end or remedy the alleged oppressive conduct — Proper plaintiff rule — Rule against reflective loss — Duplicity of proceedings — Abuse of process — The Arrangement and alleged oppressive acts are fully pleaded in a separate writ action filed earlier — Both writ action and section 346 claim seeking money compensation in term of an account of profits or damages and purchase consideration of shares as buy-out remedy respectively — Whether remedies in law adequate 1 Suit against employees of statutory body for alleged tort of misrepresentation — Immunity from suit — Cause of action not complete — The sum claimed for damages is the amount allegedly expended in performing obligations under the Agreement — No nexus between the sum claimed and the alleged tort — Sections 31 and 34A of the Universiti Teknologi MARA Act 1976 — Public Authorities Protection Act 1948 — Order 18 Rule 19(1) of the Rules of Court 2012 1
Plaintiff claims agency commission for the sale of property — Plaintiff sues 4th defendant for conspiracy and unjust enrichment — 4th defendant is not a party to the agency agreement — Whether 4th defendant is privy to the termination of the agency agreement — Whether 4th defendant’s purchase of the Request for Proposal document from plaintiff creates any privity of contract between them — Whether 4th defendant has the right to purchase the subject property — Whether the necessary particulars of conspiracy was pleaded 1 case
Claim for outstanding sum arising from inter-company services — Whether the inter-company debts were mere book-keeping entries — Whether the claim is time-barred — Whether the inter-company charges are recurring — Whether running account — Whether acknowledgement of debt in the audited accounts. 1 case
Whether fraudulent trading — Section 540 of the Companies Act 2016 — Whether claim is time barred — Whether limitation period is postponed by fraud — Section 29 of the Limitation Act 1953 — Whether the company secretary (7th Defendant) assisted in the alleged fraud arising from preparation of the resolutions for declaration of dividend and change of directors — Whether the auditor (6th Defendant) assisted in the alleged fraud arising from audit of the financial statements — Whether unjust enrichment. 1 case
Plaintiffs seek to revoke the letters of administration granted to their mother and to remove her as administrator — Plaintiffs failed to issue a citation under Order 72 rule 2(3) of the Rules of Court 2012 — Whether such failure is fatal to the action — Whether the plaintiffs’ claim for salaries as directors of the family company should be made against the company, and not against the defendants — Whether the plaintiffs should be given permission to manage the family company — Whether the plaintiffs are entitled to motor vehicles belonging to the estate of the deceased. 1 case
Plaintiffs sue to recover property transferred to defendants — Whether action is time-barred — Whether claim is barred by laches and acquiescence — Whether plaintiffs have waived and are estopped from alleging any irregularities in the transfer of the property. 1 case
strata property — judicial review — professional negligence — duty of care — abuse of process — administrative law 1 case
Action brought by plaintiff with respect to the estate of his late mother — Plaintiff did not obtain a grant of probate or letters of administration — Whether plaintiff has locus standi — Whether any special circumstances to clothe plaintiff with locus standi qua beneficiary to preserve the deceased estate — Whether the defendants are executor de son tort for intermeddling with the deceased estate — Whether plaintiff should be appointed as administrator pendente lite. 1 case
First & 9th Defendant filed to strike out Plaintiff’s claim — Whether former Director has locus standi to act in a derivative action on behalf of the company — Whether the former Director has sufficient interest in continuing the claim. 1 case
O. 18 r. 19 Rules of Court 2012 — Privity of contract — Director not party to company contract — Representative capacity — Negotiations attributed to company not director personally — Personal liability of directors — No assumption of personal liability — Lifting of corporate veil — Not pleaded — Fraud and misrepresentation — Insufficient particularity of pleading — Agency doctrine — Not pleaded — Constructive trust — No identifiable trust property — Elements not established — Abuse of process. 1 case
Order 18 rule 19(1)(d) of the Rules of Court 2012 — Whether plaintiff is guilty of forum shopping — Whether plaintiff had knowledge of an earlier suit filed in the Kuala Lumpur High Court on the same subject matter — Whether plaintiff should have counterclaimed in that suit, instead of filing a new suit in the Penang High Court — Whether plaintiff’s application for transfer of this suit to the Kuala Lumpur High Court is an abuse of process of court. 1 case
Third party claim — Indemnity clause — Whether the 1st Defendant has relinquished all duty of care on execution of the SPA and Assignment — Whether the 1st Defendant or the third party has a duty of care to the Plaintiff — Whether the developer only responsible to parts where it has exclusive control over — Whether the third party is liable to indemnify the 1st Defendant 1 case
Plaintiff seeks an injunction against the defendants from breaking the foundation stones of a temple — Plaintiff also seeks a declaration that the land given by the Penang Development Corporation (“PDC”) to the Penang Hindu Endowments Board (PHEB) is meant for relocating the temple from its old site to the said land — Whether the PDC is obliged to provide an alternative site to relocate the temple from its old site to the said land — Whether the plaintiff could accept the offer of land contained in a letter from the PDC to the PHEB — Whether the PHEB’s title to the said land is defeasible. 1 case
Court Distribution
Key People & Firms
Cases
wa-22ncc-350-06-2025
SAVILLS (MALAYSIA) SDN. BHD. v 1. ) DATO JEYARAJ A/L V. RATNASWAMY 2. ) DISTRICT GRAND LODGE OF THE EASTERN ARCHIPELAGO 3. ) CHRIS TEH TEONG KHUAN 4. ) EXSIM DEVELOPMENT SDN BHD 5. ) CHRISTOPHER MARTIN BOYD
12 November 2025
MYHC
wa-22ncc-332-05-2025
SARWAJA TIMUR SDN BHD v TRENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE SDN BHD
6 November 2025
MYHC
ba-22ncc-153-11-2023
MACRO RESOURCES SDN BHD v 1. ) TAN SHIE KHAI 2. ) HO SUE LENG 3. ) TAM AH CHAI @ TAM YOKE KEE 4. ) SAHIMI BIN AHMAD 5. ) HORNTIAN GROUP SDN. BHD. 6. ) POH CHIN CHYE (Beramal di Tetuan C C Poh & Co yang Mempunyai Pendaftaran No.AF 1415) 7. ) LIM MOI YOKE (Beramal di Skrin Corporate Services Sdn Bhd yang Mempunyai Syarikat No.636114-T)
9 September 2025
MYHC
pa-22ncvc-49-04-2025
1. ) THINAKARAN A/L SANTHIRA SEGARAN 2. ) KASTHURI A/P SANTHIRA SEGARAN v 1. ) RAJESWARY A/P PERUMAL 2. ) GOBINATHAN A/L SANTHIRA SEGARAN
18 August 2025
MYHC
pa-22ncvc-47-04-2025
1. ) DATO' KHOR LEE NAM (SEBAGAI PEMEGANG JAWATAN KEPADA KO YANG TONG SOCIETY (NO. PENDAFTARAN PPM-004-07-22021951)) 2. ) KHOR KEAT CHAIN (SEBAGAI PEMEGANG JAWATAN KEPADA KO YANG TONG SOCIETY (NO. PENDAFTARAN PPM-004-07-22021951)) 3. ) KHOR HOCK THYE (SEBAGAI PEMEGANG JAWATAN KEPADA KO YANG TONG SOCIETY (NO. PENDAFTARAN PPM-004-07-22021951)) v 1. ) DATO' SERI KHOR SOO PING (SEBAGAI PEMEGANG JAWATAN KEPADA SAW KHAW LEAN (HEAH) CHONG SHU (NO. PENDAFTARAN PPM-003-07-15061960)) 2. ) SAW KOK PENG ...
4 August 2025
MYHC
wa-22ncc-811-11-2024
Symmid Corporation Sdn. Bhd. v Nurhaslina Binti Mohamed Nor PIHAK TERKILAN 1. ) MESRIAH BINTI KADIRAN 2. ) Dato' Hazri Bin Mohamed Nor 3. ) CREATE TEQ SDN BHD 4. ) Dato' Norhisam Bin Mohamed Nor 5. ) Nurhafizah Binti Mohamed Nor 6. ) Nurkhairun Nisa Binti Mohamed Nor 7. ) Nor Zulfaqar Bin Mohamed Nor 8. ) Publika Entity Sdn Bhd 9. ) Admiral Dreams Sdn Bhd 10. ) Nour Vision Sdn Bhd 11. ) Prominent Strikes Sdn Bhd 12. ) Dato' Hisam Bin Mohamed Nor 13. ) Noktah Laksamana Sdn Bhd
2 July 2025
MYHC
wa-22ncvc-720-11-2024
MENARA 1 MK SUBSIDIARI MANAGEMENT CORPORATION v 1. ) 1 MONT KIARA DAN KIARA 2 MANAGEMENT CORPORATION 2. ) Chuang Kuan Han (Psp A18)
23 June 2025
MYHC
pa-22ncvc-200-12-2024
THEOW SAY KOW @ TEOH KIANG SENG v 1. ) TEOH KHIAN GUAN 2. ) FONG LAI WAN 3. ) TEOH SUREEN 4. ) MICHELLE TEOH SUE MAE 5. ) TEOH JULIAN 6. ) SOLOMON TEOH 7. ) TEOH KIANG HONG, GARY 8. ) ONG BEE LEE 9. ) TEOH SEW NGOH, IRENE 10. ) TEOH SIEW NGANG 11. ) TEOH SIEW LEE
26 May 2025
MYHC
wa-22ncc-403-06-2024
Nautilus Tug & Towage Sdn. Bhd. v 1. ) Dato Sri Suresh Emmanuel Abishegam 2. ) Dato Ahmad Johari Bin Abdul Razak 3. ) Ajaib Hari Dass 4. ) Dato Abd Latiff Bin Ahmad 5. ) Jaya Sudhir A/L Jayaram 6. ) Mak Lin Kum 7. ) Ahmad Lutfi Bin Abd Latiff 8. ) Dato Sri Abd Rahim Bin Jaafar 9. ) Azimuth Marine Sdn. Bhd.
12 May 2025
MYHC
wa-22ncc-87-02-2024
HSC Medical Inc. v 1. ) ConserveNRG Sdn. Bhd. 2. ) Vivek G. Dharkar 3. ) M Ramanathan a/l S.M. Meyyappan PIHAK TERKILAN Ng Yeen Seen
4 May 2025
MYHC
pa-22ncvc-7-01-2025
S L NG TRADING AGENCY SDN BHD v TOHTONKU SDN BHD
26 March 2025
MYHC
ba-22ncvc-55-02-2024
1. ) DAQ WAREHOUSE SDN BHD 2. ) DAQ LOGISTICS SDN BHD 3. ) DEEP SEA FISHERY KINGDOM SDN BHD v 1. ) TANG LIN YAU SDN BHD 2. ) ECOLD REFRIGERATION SDN BHD 3. ) TAN YOW BOON PENCELAH BASIC FRONTIER SDN BHD
12 March 2025
MYHC
pa-24ncvc-1065-08-2024
Mathiyalagan A/l Veeriah (Pengerusi Pertubuhan Penganut Dewi Seri Muthu Mariamman. Batu Kawan, Seberang Perai Selatan - (Ppm-003-07-28032003) v 1. ) SETIAUSAHA, LEMBAGA WAKAF HINDU NEGERI PULAU PINANG 2. ) PENGERUSI LEMBAGA WAKAF HINDU NEGERI PULAU PINANG 3. ) PERBADANAN PEMBANGUNAN PULAU PINANG (PDC)
12 February 2025
MYHC
ba-24ncc-120-10-2023
1. ) NG CHIK VOON 2. ) TAN SWEE HOE 3. ) KOAY KUAN KING 4. ) CHENG TEN SIONG v 1. ) STRONGHOLD CYCLES SDN BHD 2. ) DIDI RESOURCES SDN BHD 3. ) DIDI AUTOMOTIVE SDN BHD 4. ) DIDI MOTORCYCLES SDN BHD 5. ) DIDI LIFESTYLE PTE LTD 6. ) GB MOTORS REALTY SDN BHD 7. ) GOH BROTHERS MOTORCYCLES SDN BHD 8. ) GOH BROTHERS CAPITAL SDN BHD 9. ) TELAGAMAS CAPITAL SDN BHD 10. ) GOH KIAN SIN 11. ) JUAN CHOW WEE
21 January 2025
MYHC
ba-22ncvc-53-02-2023
MY-PARTNERS VIDEO TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS SDN. BHD. v 1. ) Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) 2. ) PROF. DATO' IR Ts. DR. HJ. MOHD FOZI ALI 3. ) PROF. MADYA DR. HAIDAR DZIYAUDDIN
8 January 2025
MYHC