Contract

60 cases · May 2017 to February 2026

Case Volume by Year

1
17
2
18
3
19
2
21
47
25
5
26
2017–2026

Key Issues & Sub-Topics

Illegality — Moneylending transaction — Sale and purchase agreements alleged to be sham — Whether agreements intended to disguise loan transaction — Whether contravened Moneylenders Act 1951 — Unlicensed moneylending — Effect of illegality — Whether agreements enforceable — Moneylenders Act 1951, ss 2, 5, 10OA, 15, 17A Contract — Illegality — Moneylending transaction — Sale and purchase agreements declared unenforceable — Effect on third-party claims — Whether plaintiff had beneficial interest in property — Moneylenders Act 1951, s 15 Contract — Privity of contract — Plaintiff not a party to sale and purchase agreement — Whether plaintiff entitled to assert rights against subsequent purchaser Contract — Sham agreements — Test — Intention of parties — Circumstantial evidence — Whether sale and purchase agreements were façade to camouflage illegal moneylending — Whether court entitled to lift veil and examine substance of transaction Appeal — Powers of appellate court — Failure of trial judge to address pleaded issue — Whether appellate court may determine issue not decided by trial court — Whether omission constitutes appealable error Equity — Beneficial interest — Whether illegal and void transaction capable of conferring equitable or beneficial rights Evidence — Presumption — Moneylenders Act 1951 — Presumption of moneylending — Burden of proof — Failure to rebut statutory presumption — Effect 2 offer and acceptance — counter offer Sale of land — whether acceptance by the purchaser is conditional Whether the inclusion of additional terms in the acceptance amounted to a counter offer Whether there is a valid contract 2 Guarantee — Guarantee Service Provider scheme under Kafalah contract — Concurrent rights of bank against customer and guarantee service provider — Corporate Guarantee’s right of subrogation and right of recourse — Whether bank entitled to recover from either or both — Whether defendant ultimately liable — Contracts Act 1950, s.77, s.78, s.79, & s.81. 2 Guarantee — Liability of guarantor — Guarantors claimed that they did not allegedly agree to guarantee the performance of the First Defendant’s obligation to pay any sums outstanding but had only promised that the First Defendant will comply with the terms of the agreement ­ — Whether the Guarantors are discharge of their obligations — Letter of comfort 2 Service contract — Safety obligations — failure to comply with with employer’s regulations — Occupational Safety and Health Act 1994 — Non-delegable duty of contractor 1 Mandate letter — Success fees — Discrete and severable obligations — Whether single composite transaction — Construction of commercial agreements — Acknowledgment of indebtedness in contractual recital — Legal effect of express admission — Whether debtor entitled to reopen underlying merits after express acknowledgment 1 Loan agreement — Forbearance — Conversion of outstanding fees into loan — Whether repayment obligation independent and enforceable — Whether conditional upon completion or success of IPO — Effect of affirmation and election 1 Illegality — Capital Markets and Services Act 2007 s 58 — Contracts Act 1950 s 24 — Alleged unlicensed corporate finance advisory services — Whether sufficient nexus between statutory prohibition and contract sued upon — Whether repayment agreement tainted by antecedent illegality — Fully executed transaction 1 Performance — Alleged non-performance contradicted by contemporaneous documents and partial payment — Whether bare denial sufficient to resist summary judgment — Whether detrimental advice relevant to enforceability of admitted debt 1 Wrongful termination — Illegality not pleaded — Ex facie vs non-ex facie illegality — Order 18 r 8 ROC 2012 1 Joint venture — Joint venture agreement — Frustration — Contracts Act 1950 s 57(2) — Whether contract frustrated — Whether frustration self-induced — Risk allocation — Evidence — Expert evidence — Evidence Act 1950 s 45 — Adverse inference — Evidence Act 1950 s 114(g) 1 Islamic financing — Qardhul Hasan facility — Termination of facility — Condition precedent to enforcement — Requirement of termination notice before entire sum becomes due and payable — Failure to terminate in earlier action — Whether subsequent termination crystallised debt 1 Breach — Failure to make instalment payments — Default admitted — Whether plaintiff entitled to recover full outstanding sum after valid termination 1 Tenancy agreement — Construction and renovation obligations — Allocation of responsibility — Rent-free period — Obligation on tenant to carry out works and obtain approvals — Certificate of completion and compliance — Whether landlord in breach 1 Breach — Share sale agreement — Agreement terminated pursuant to Defendant’s breach — Plaintiffs sought consequential remedies following the termination — Reciprocal promise — No CDS account provided — Whether Plaintiff had prevented Defendant from performing reciprocal promise — Whether act constitutes Plaintiff's failure to perform its reciprocal promise — Whether providing CDS account is a substantive obligation — s.52 and 53 of the Contracts Act 1950 1 Construction of Testamentary Instrument — Modern approach to construction — Ascertaining intention of testator from ordinary meaning of words — Giving effect to all provisions of Will — No implication of terms where language is clear — Kalwant Singh a/l Ujagar Singh v Jaswant Kaur a/p Ujagar Singh applied 1 Sale and Purchase Agreement — Delay in delivery of vacant possession — Claim for liquidated ascertained damages — Developer attributing delay to water supply system completion — Whether discovery against third party necessary to determine liability 1 Sale and Purchase Agreement — Dispute over ownership of property — Consent judgment — Subsequent sale by vendor to third party — Plaintiff seeking declaration of ownership and damages — Whether plaintiff's claim against second defendant sufficiently strong to refuse security 1 Musharakah agreement — Nature and proof of claim — Plaintiff suing for breach — Whether claim proven on balance of probabilities — Plaintiff founding case on agreement — Obligation to abide by all material terms — Loss-sharing as defining characteristic of musharakah — Plaintiff claiming fixed returns without accounting for venture losses — Failure to discharge legal burden of proof — Claim dismissed. 1 Prematurity of action — Settlement and extension of time — Binding variation — Acceleration clause — Whether action maintainable when filed before extended due date — Plaintiff invoking general acceleration clause for “any breach” — Clause 2.7 of extension letter — Whether triggered by mere non-payment before maturity date — Principle that acceleration clause requires breach of substantive obligation — No breach of covenant alleged prior to suit — Action held premature and struck out. 1 + 44 more

Illegality — Moneylending transaction — Sale and purchase agreements alleged to be sham — Whether agreements intended to disguise loan transaction — Whether contravened Moneylenders Act 1951 — Unlicensed moneylending — Effect of illegality — Whether agreements enforceable — Moneylenders Act 1951, ss 2, 5, 10OA, 15, 17A Contract — Illegality — Moneylending transaction — Sale and purchase agreements declared unenforceable — Effect on third-party claims — Whether plaintiff had beneficial interest in property — Moneylenders Act 1951, s 15 Contract — Privity of contract — Plaintiff not a party to sale and purchase agreement — Whether plaintiff entitled to assert rights against subsequent purchaser Contract — Sham agreements — Test — Intention of parties — Circumstantial evidence — Whether sale and purchase agreements were façade to camouflage illegal moneylending — Whether court entitled to lift veil and examine substance of transaction Appeal — Powers of appellate court — Failure of trial judge to address pleaded issue — Whether appellate court may determine issue not decided by trial court — Whether omission constitutes appealable error Equity — Beneficial interest — Whether illegal and void transaction capable of conferring equitable or beneficial rights Evidence — Presumption — Moneylenders Act 1951 — Presumption of moneylending — Burden of proof — Failure to rebut statutory presumption — Effect 2 cases

Guarantee — Guarantee Service Provider scheme under Kafalah contract — Concurrent rights of bank against customer and guarantee service provider — Corporate Guarantee’s right of subrogation and right of recourse — Whether bank entitled to recover from either or both — Whether defendant ultimately liable — Contracts Act 1950, s.77, s.78, s.79, & s.81. 2 cases

Guarantee — Liability of guarantor — Guarantors claimed that they did not allegedly agree to guarantee the performance of the First Defendant’s obligation to pay any sums outstanding but had only promised that the First Defendant will comply with the terms of the agreement ­ — Whether the Guarantors are discharge of their obligations — Letter of comfort 2 cases

Service contract — Safety obligations — failure to comply with with employer’s regulations — Occupational Safety and Health Act 1994 — Non-delegable duty of contractor 1 case

Loan agreement — Forbearance — Conversion of outstanding fees into loan — Whether repayment obligation independent and enforceable — Whether conditional upon completion or success of IPO — Effect of affirmation and election 1 case

Illegality — Capital Markets and Services Act 2007 s 58 — Contracts Act 1950 s 24 — Alleged unlicensed corporate finance advisory services — Whether sufficient nexus between statutory prohibition and contract sued upon — Whether repayment agreement tainted by antecedent illegality — Fully executed transaction 1 case

Performance — Alleged non-performance contradicted by contemporaneous documents and partial payment — Whether bare denial sufficient to resist summary judgment — Whether detrimental advice relevant to enforceability of admitted debt 1 case

Wrongful termination — Illegality not pleaded — Ex facie vs non-ex facie illegality — Order 18 r 8 ROC 2012 1 case

Joint venture — Joint venture agreement — Frustration — Contracts Act 1950 s 57(2) — Whether contract frustrated — Whether frustration self-induced — Risk allocation — Evidence — Expert evidence — Evidence Act 1950 s 45 — Adverse inference — Evidence Act 1950 s 114(g) 1 case

Islamic financing — Qardhul Hasan facility — Termination of facility — Condition precedent to enforcement — Requirement of termination notice before entire sum becomes due and payable — Failure to terminate in earlier action — Whether subsequent termination crystallised debt 1 case

Breach — Failure to make instalment payments — Default admitted — Whether plaintiff entitled to recover full outstanding sum after valid termination 1 case

Tenancy agreement — Construction and renovation obligations — Allocation of responsibility — Rent-free period — Obligation on tenant to carry out works and obtain approvals — Certificate of completion and compliance — Whether landlord in breach 1 case

Breach — Share sale agreement — Agreement terminated pursuant to Defendant’s breach — Plaintiffs sought consequential remedies following the termination — Reciprocal promise — No CDS account provided — Whether Plaintiff had prevented Defendant from performing reciprocal promise — Whether act constitutes Plaintiff's failure to perform its reciprocal promise — Whether providing CDS account is a substantive obligation — s.52 and 53 of the Contracts Act 1950 1 case

Construction of Testamentary Instrument — Modern approach to construction — Ascertaining intention of testator from ordinary meaning of words — Giving effect to all provisions of Will — No implication of terms where language is clear — Kalwant Singh a/l Ujagar Singh v Jaswant Kaur a/p Ujagar Singh applied 1 case

Prematurity of action — Settlement and extension of time — Binding variation — Acceleration clause — Whether action maintainable when filed before extended due date — Plaintiff invoking general acceleration clause for “any breach” — Clause 2.7 of extension letter — Whether triggered by mere non-payment before maturity date — Principle that acceleration clause requires breach of substantive obligation — No breach of covenant alleged prior to suit — Action held premature and struck out. 1 case

Privity of contract — Novation — Appellant’s original contract with DBKL novated to concessionaire, Alam Flora Sdn Bhd — No direct contractual relationship between Appellant and Government Respondents — "No privity" clause in Concession Agreement — Appellant a "stranger" to the agreement — Claim against Government unsustainable. 1 case

Formation — Implied contract — Sub-distribution agreement — Existence of binding agreement — Whether formed by conduct and correspondence — Letter of intent, appointment emails and letters of authorisation — Parties conducting themselves as distributor and sub-distributor over extended period — Whether agreement could be implied from facts — Termination — Reasonable notice — Implied term — Whether terminable on reasonable notice — Immediate termination without notice — Whether repudiatory breach — What constitutes reasonable notice — Factors considered — Duration of relationship, remaining term of customer contracts, need for orderly handover. 1 case

Pre-incorporation contract — Letter of confirmation for rent executed before company’s incorporation — Whether contract made on behalf of company — Whether subsequent conduct amounted to ratification — Absence of privity — Whether novation required — Companies Act 2016, s 65(1) and (2) 1 case

Assignment of property by way of gift — Plaintiff alleged he is the rightful owner — Defendant alleged her signature was forged — Whether there was forgery — No expert called to testify — Comparison of signatures — Evaluation on direct and circumstantial evidence 1 case

Share Sale Agreement — Contingent contract — Alleged failure of underlying basis of agreement — Claim for refund of RM6,000,000 — Breach — Alleged default — Failure to issue default notice. 1 case

the intentions of the parties are to be gathered from the language used in the agreement — unless the Defendant can prove on the balance of probabilities that she did not receive the money, the court is entitled to make an inference from the wordings in the SPA that the purchase price was fully paid by the Deceased on the date the SPA was signed. 1 case

Interpretation of Agreements— Core Business Agreement (CBA) — Arbitration clause in CBA (Clause 20) — Ad-hoc Quotation — Whether Quotation was a standalone contract — Whether Quotation superseded CBA — Incorporation of arbitration clause 1 case

Tenancy agreement — Interpretation of clauses relating to repair and indemnity — Whether contractual terms impose liability on landlord for tenant’s acts 1 case

Account stated — Acknowledgment of debt — Settlement agreements — Post-dated cheques — Partial payments — Whether admission of liability 1 case

Key Statutes

cited in 4 cases
cited in 3 cases
Rules of Court 2012
cited in 3 cases
Moneylenders Act 1951
cited in 2 cases
Moneylenders Act 1951
cited in 2 cases
Moneylending Act 1951
cited in 2 cases
cited in 1 case
Civil Law Act 1956
cited in 1 case
Contracts Act 1950
cited in 1 case
Government Proceedings Act 1956
cited in 1 case
Contracts Act 1950
cited in 1 case
Contract Act 1950
cited in 1 case

Court Distribution

Key People & Firms

Cases

Page 1 of 3
da-22ncvc-2-01-2024
Lotus Park Sdn. Bhd v Tenaga Nasional Berhad
11 February 2026
MYHC
wa-22ncvc-578-10-2025
WHATMAN CAPITAL PTE. LTD. v 1. ) Dato' Ng Meng Kee 2. ) Datuk Ng Meng Poh 3. ) MEGA FORTRIS BERHAD
26 January 2026
MYHC
ja-12bncvc-14-07-2024
PARAMESWAREN A/L PERUMAL v DELTA ZEEFORCE SECURITY SERVICES SDN. BHD.
22 January 2026
MYHC
ja-22ncvc-4-01-2020
MULTI MERIDIAN SDN BHD v ISKANDAR REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (IRDA)
22 January 2026
MYHC
wa-22m-131-02-2024
Majlis Amanah Rakyat (MARA) v SHABRI BIN SULONG
13 January 2026
MYHC
wa-22ncvc-167-03-2025
BAEV Holdings Sdn Bhd v 1. ) Yong Chun Khiong 2. ) MBL Agarwood ECO Leisureland Sdn Bhd
21 December 2025
MYHC
wa-24ncc-325-06-2025
1. ) LIM KHAI GUAN 2. ) LOH SIOW PENG v CHERISH WORDS SDN BHD
18 December 2025
MYHC
wa-24ncvc-4872-12-2024
LIEW WENG TANG v 1. ) CHEW MEU JONG 2. ) LIM IEE KUAN
11 December 2025
MYHC
wa-24ncvc-5150-12-2024
1. ) HALIL IZRAN BIN ZAHID 2. ) NAIMAH BINTI MOHAMAD NOH 3. ) SITI NURUL AIN BINTI MOHD ZAWAWI 4. ) LOW PEI FENG 5. ) YULIZAH BINTI PARDI 6. ) FATIN NURAIN BINTI KAMARUZAMAN 7. ) HARYANTI BINTI IBRAHIM 8. ) MOHD SHAHRIL BIN MOHD SHAFI 9. ) MOHD SYAFIQ BIN MOHD SHAH 10. ) NUR HIDAYAH BINTI MARZUKHI 11. ) KAMARUZAMAN BIN AMAT 12. ) MUHAMMAD HAFIZ BIN ABDUL RAHMAN SITHIRAVEL 13. ) SITI NUR AISHAH BINTI SALIMON 14. ) AZNIZA BINTI MOHAMED 15. ) WAN HABIBULLAH BINTI WAN IBRAHIM 16. ) MOHD RIZAL BIN...
7 December 2025
MYHC
wa-24ncvc-4976-12-2024
Mohammed Shabaz Khan v 1. ) Crest Worldwide Resources Sdn Bhd (In Liquidation) 2. ) Shamir Kumar Nandy
1 December 2025
MYHC
wa-22m-1624-10-2023
AL SAKB CAPITAL BERHAD v 1. ) RAHMAN BROTHERS AUTOMOTIVE SDN. BHD. 2. ) RABIATUL ADAWIYAH BTE ABDUL RAHMAN
24 November 2025
MYHC
w-01ncvcw-180-03-2024
GULAM WAWASAN SDN BHD v 1. ) Kerajaan Malaysia 2. ) KEMENTERIAN PERUMAHAN DAN KERAJAAN TEMPATAN 3. ) JABATAN PENGURUSAN SISA PEPEJAL NEGARA 4. ) Dato' Sri Haji Mohammad Bin Mentek, Ketua Setiausaha Kementerian Perumahan Dan Kerajaan Tempatan 5. ) ISMAIL BIN MOKHTAR, KETUA EKSEKUTIF SOLID WASTE AND PUBLIC CLEANSING MANAGEMENT CORPORATION 6. ) SOLID WASTE AND PUBLIC CLEANSING MANAGEMENT CORPOR
20 November 2025
MYCOA
wa-22ncc-785-10-2023
EXELLE MEDICAL SDN. BHD. v 1. ) MK MEDILANCE SDN. BHD. 2. ) INTERMEDECO SDN. BHD. 3. ) CHIN KEH JOO
9 November 2025
MYHC
wa-12ancvc-132-07-2024
FLUFFY STUDIO SDN BHD v ARIF SEJATI SDN BHD
2 November 2025
MYHC
ba-22ncvc-217-06-2022
LIM THIAM BOK v LIM GEK SUAN
30 October 2025
MYHC
n-02ncvcw-792-05-2024
1. ) TANG SER CHIEW 2. ) LIM YAR TING v LEE MEI KIM
27 October 2025
MYCOA
n-02ncvcw-802-05-2024
PANG VENG YAEN v LEE MEI KIM
27 October 2025
MYCOA
wa-22ncc-742-10-2024
TASEK GELUGOR DEVELOPMENT SDN BHD v LIM YIT KIAN
14 October 2025
MYHC
bl-11bncvc-4-03-2025
Prem Shivani Sdn Bhd v 1. ) PARVATHY A/P SUBRAMANIAM 2. ) VASANTHI A/P RAMAN
9 October 2025
MYHC
wa-12ancc-88-10-2024
YES TRAVEL & HOLIDAYS SDN. BHD. v 1. ) MIKI TRAVEL (HONG KONG) LIMITED 2. ) MIKI TRAVEL SDN BHD
9 October 2025
MYHC
wa-22ncvc-174-03-2025
1. ) GENERALI INSURANCE MALAYSIA BERHAD 2. ) TAKAFUL IKHLAS GENERAL BERHAD 3. ) SS MOTOR CENTURY SDN. BHD. v 1. ) WAWASAN SINAR GEMILANG SDN. BHD. 2. ) Kua Guan Chai 3. ) Phun Booi Mooi
7 October 2025
MYHC
wa-22ncvc-177-03-2025
1. ) TAN CHEE SENG 2. ) LIM YA HUI 3. ) KC WORKPLACE SDN BHD 4. ) WONG KHIM SIONG 5. ) WONG HONG JIAN 6. ) CV ACADEMY SDN BHD 7. ) CALL W SDN BHD 8. ) TAN CHEE BOON v 1. ) HOO VOON HIM 2. ) V INVESCO FUND (L) LIMITED 3. ) V INVESCO SDN BHD
28 September 2025
MYHC
wa-12ancvc-124-07-2024
THEAN YAW YEONG (didakwa sebagai individu dan/atau pemilik tunggal firma guaman Tetuan Thean & Co) v 1. ) YAP HOONG CHAI 2. ) CHENG YING YING
25 September 2025
MYHC
wa-12bncc-16-06-2023
1. ) TAN TEE HUI 2. ) Soon Siew Ling v DE FOOD CREATOR SDN BHD
24 September 2025
MYHC
aa-22ncvc-74-10-2020
CAHAYA WIBAWA SDN.BHD v DEWAN PERNIAGAAN INDIA PERAK (Perak Indian Chamber of Commerce) dan diwakili oleh Majlis atau pemegang-pemegang yang bernama 1.RAVISANKAR A/L BALASUBRAMANIAM Pengurusi 2.HAJI SULTAN ABDUL KHADER A/L SHAIK MOHAMED-Timbalan Pengerusi 3. ASOKAN A/L YATHIRAJU-Setiausaha 4.SARAVANABAWAN MATHIALAGAN-Penolong Setiausaha 5.MUNIAMMAL A/P SUPPIAH CHETTIAR-Bendahari 6.GANESAN A/L SUBRAMANIAM-Ahli J/kuasa 7.MANIMARAN A/L EKAMPARAM -Ahli J/Kuasa 8.YEGAMBARAM AM SUPPIAH PILLAY-Ahli ...
22 September 2025
MYHC