CIVIL PROCEDURE: Summary judgment

3 cases · March 2025 to April 2025

Key Issues & Sub-Topics

Order 14 application — Requirements for summary judgment — Whether plaintiff has satisfied preliminary requirements — Whether defendants have raised triable issues — Standard of proof for establishing triable defence — Whether mere assertions constitute credible evidence — Whether documentary evidence establishes clear liability 1 Order 14 applications — Prima facie case establishment — Burden of proof shifting to defendant — Whether defendant has triable defence — Whether bare denials constitute genuine defence — Sufficiency of documentary evidence 1 Order 14 Rules of Court 2012 — Triable issues — Whether defendant raised valid triable issues — Whether prima facie case established — Whether burden of proof satisfied — Striking out pleadings — Order 18 Rule 19 Rules of Court 2012 — Whether counterclaim obviously unsustainable — Whether pleadings frivolous or vexatious — Whether counterclaim constitutes abuse of process 1

Order 14 application — Requirements for summary judgment — Whether plaintiff has satisfied preliminary requirements — Whether defendants have raised triable issues — Standard of proof for establishing triable defence — Whether mere assertions constitute credible evidence — Whether documentary evidence establishes clear liability 1 case

wa-22ncc-641-09-2024 D2D BIZHUB SDN. BHD. v 1. ) ALPHA FINTECH SDN. BHD. 2. ) KOH CHEE SIONG BUKAN PIHAK-PIHAK TEOH WENG BOON

Order 14 applications — Prima facie case establishment — Burden of proof shifting to defendant — Whether defendant has triable defence — Whether bare denials constitute genuine defence — Sufficiency of documentary evidence 1 case

wa-22ncc-619-09-2024 PAC LEASE BERHAD v 1. ) GRENEPARK VILLAGE SDN. BHD. 2. ) GREGORY AMOS YOON PENG SUM 3. ) MOHD HALIM WHY BIN ABDULLAH 4. ) PARAGRENE LAND BERHAD

Order 14 Rules of Court 2012 — Triable issues — Whether defendant raised valid triable issues — Whether prima facie case established — Whether burden of proof satisfied — Striking out pleadings — Order 18 Rule 19 Rules of Court 2012 — Whether counterclaim obviously unsustainable — Whether pleadings frivolous or vexatious — Whether counterclaim constitutes abuse of process 1 case

wa-22ncc-573-08-2024 EMUM CAPITAL SDN BHD v 1. ) GREAT CONCRETE SDN BHD 2. ) TEH KHYE CHIN 3. ) ANANDARAO A/L ATCHANNAH

Court Distribution

Key People & Firms

Top Judges

Atan Mustaffa Yussof Ahmad 3

Cases

wa-22ncc-641-09-2024

D2D BIZHUB SDN. BHD. v 1. ) ALPHA FINTECH SDN. BHD. 2. ) KOH CHEE SIONG BUKAN PIHAK-PIHAK TEOH WENG BOON

wa-22ncc-619-09-2024

PAC LEASE BERHAD v 1. ) GRENEPARK VILLAGE SDN. BHD. 2. ) GREGORY AMOS YOON PENG SUM 3. ) MOHD HALIM WHY BIN ABDULLAH 4. ) PARAGRENE LAND BERHAD

wa-22ncc-573-08-2024

EMUM CAPITAL SDN BHD v 1. ) GREAT CONCRETE SDN BHD 2. ) TEH KHYE CHIN 3. ) ANANDARAO A/L ATCHANNAH