ABDUL JALIL BIN JAMALUDIN v Pendakwa Raya
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (4)
Case Significance
ABDUL JALIL BIN JAMALUDIN v Pendakwa Raya is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated January 22, 2026 (citation: wa-42s-2-05-2024). <p>The appellant was convicted of possession of 65.39 grams and 9.04 grams of cannabis found respectively in his left socks and on his motorcycle carrier, and sentenced to 8 years' imprisonment with 10 strokes and 2 years' imprisonment respectively. The defence argued there was a break in the chain of evidence and relied on short videos of the arrest incident, but the court found the prosecution witnesses credible and the chain of evidence intact. The High Court affirmed the conviction and sente The case was decided by Noor Ruwena binti Md. Nurdin. Counsel appearing: Faridah Nurdinie Binti Bahrum (counsel for respondent), Muhammad Aiman Bin Mohd Fauzi (counsel for appellant), Muhammad Danish (counsel for appellant).
Summary
The appellant was convicted of possession of 65.39 grams and 9.04 grams of cannabis found respectively in his left socks and on his motorcycle carrier, and sentenced to 8 years' imprisonment with 10 strokes and 2 years' imprisonment respectively. The defence argued there was a break in the chain of evidence and relied on short videos of the arrest incident, but the court found the prosecution witnesses credible and the chain of evidence intact. The High Court affirmed the conviction and sentence, finding no error of fact or law by the Sessions Court.
What was the outcome of ABDUL JALIL BIN JAMALUDIN v Pendakwa Raya?
<p>The appellant was convicted of possession of 65.39 grams and 9.04 grams of cannabis found respectively in his left socks and on his motorcycle carr...