GOOI & AZURA v 1. ) Pendakwa Raya 2. ) GENNEVA MALAYSIA SDN BHD 3. ) TAN LIANG KEAT 4. ) LIM KAH HENG 5. ) NG POH WENG 6. ) PHILIP LIM JIT MENG 7. ) AHMAD KHAIRUDDIN BIN ILIAS

wa-42ors-9-06-2025 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 22 April 2026 • WA-42(Ors)-9-06/2025 • 24 min read

Outcome

Atas alasan-alasan ini, rayuan ini ditolak. Keputusan Mahkamah Bicara menolak permohonan Perayu untuk mencelah dikekalkan.

Quoted verbatim from the judgment of High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) (wa-42ors-9-06-2025). Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal for the complete decision.

Catchwords

Legal fees outstanding-whether right of counsel to intervene as bona fide third party to forfeiture application

Practice Areas

Criminal Procedure

Judges (1)

Nurulhuda Nur'aini binti Mohamad Nor Delivered

Counsel (5)

Gooi & Azura Firm Belinda Low Siet Yen Counsel Appellant Gooi Soon Seng Counsel Appellant Muhammad Azmi Bin Mashud Counsel Respondent Norzilati Izhani binti Zainal @ Zainol Counsel Respondent

Parties (8)

GENNEVA MALAYSIA Sdn Bhd Respondent Pendakwa Raya Respondent Ahmad Khairuddin bin Ilias Respondent Gooi & Azura Appellant Lim Kah Heng Respondent Ng Poh Weng Respondent Philip Lim Jit Meng Respondent Tan Liang Keat Respondent

Statutes Cited

Criminal Procedure Code (Cap 593)

Customs Act 1967 (Cap 235)

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (wa-42ors-9-06-2025)