SAMSUNG C&T (KL) SDN. BHD. v M & M CONSTRUCTION SDN. BHD.

wa-28pw-758-12-2025 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 26 January 2026 • WA-28PW-758-12/2025 • 5 min read
3 cases cited (0 SG, 3 foreign)

Outcome

As such, I dismissed Encl 1 with no order as to costs.

Quoted verbatim from the judgment of High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) (wa-28pw-758-12-2025). Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal for the complete decision.

Catchwords

Company law-Winding up-Petition by creditor-Section 465 Companies Act 2016-Inability to pay debts - Statutory demand-Failure to satisfy debt-Whether debt bona fide disputed on substantial grounds-Construction contract dispute-Adjudication decision under Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication Act 2012 -Enforcement of adjudicated sum-Abuse of process -Discretion of court - Whether winding-up petition ought to be granted or dismissed.

Practice Areas

Company Law Construction Law

Judges (1)

Suhendran Sockanathan Delivered

Counsel (3)

YY Chin & Co. Firm Bryan Tan Counsel Applicant Engku Norsuhaila binti Engku Zain Counsel Respondent

Parties (2)

M & M CONSTRUCTION Sdn Bhd Respondent SAMSUNG C&T Sdn Bhd Applicant

Statutes Cited

Companies Act
s 223
Companies Act 2016 (Cap 777)

Cases Cited (3)

MY (3)
[1985] 2 MLJ 446 [2014] 4 MLJ 886 [2024] MLJU 2479

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (wa-28pw-758-12-2025)