NORTON CONSTRUCTION SDN BHD v GLOMAC KRISTAL SDN BHD
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (5)
Case Significance
NORTON CONSTRUCTION SDN BHD v GLOMAC KRISTAL SDN BHD is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated November 23, 2025 (citation: wa-24carb-32-08-2025). <p>This enforcement application by Norton Construction under section 38 of the Arbitration Act 2005 was heard together with Glomac Kristal's setting aside application (OS 30). Norton sought to register the PAM arbitration final award as a judgment of the High Court. The enforcement was allowed with costs of RM10,000 after the court dismissed the setting aside application, holding that the award was final and binding with no valid legal barrier to enforcement.</p> The case was decided by Rajes Raghavji. Counsel appearing: Hasnan Hamzah (counsel for respondent), Tunku Ahmad Munawwir bin Tunku Ahmad Mustaffa (counsel for respondent), Yap Chean Hong (counsel for applicant).
Summary
This enforcement application by Norton Construction under section 38 of the Arbitration Act 2005 was heard together with Glomac Kristal's setting aside application (OS 30). Norton sought to register the PAM arbitration final award as a judgment of the High Court. The enforcement was allowed with costs of RM10,000 after the court dismissed the setting aside application, holding that the award was final and binding with no valid legal barrier to enforcement.
What was the outcome of NORTON CONSTRUCTION SDN BHD v GLOMAC KRISTAL SDN BHD?
<p>This enforcement application by Norton Construction under section 38 of the Arbitration Act 2005 was heard together with Glomac Kristal's setting a...