1. ) ALAN KNOWLES 2. ) ALEXANDRA FRANCES MARY KNOWLES v 1. ) KETUA PENGARAH JABATAN PENDAFTARAN NEGARA 2. ) MENTERI DALAM NEGERI MALAYSIA 3. ) Kerajaan Malaysia
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (3)
Case Significance
A citizenship-by-operation-of-law application for an adopted child of unknown parentage, dismissed because the foundling presumption and the jus sanguinis requirement were not evidentially established.
This High Court decision concerns a citizenship application brought by way of originating summons, in which the applicants — the adoptive parents and litigation representative of a young child whose birth certificate categorised her as a non-citizen — sought a declaration that the child is a Malaysian citizen by operation of law. The applicants are British citizens who had taken the child into their care through a care centre in Seremban.
The application was put on two constitutional footings under the Second Schedule to the Federal Constitution. The first relied on Article 14(1)(b) read with section 1(a) of Part II and section 19B of Part III — the provision that raises a presumption of citizenship in favour of a newborn child found exposed, whose parents are unknown. The question was whether the evidence established the factual foundation of a newly born found exposed needed to invoke that presumption. The second footing relied on Article 14(1)(b) read with section 1(e) and section 2(3) of Part II, engaging the principle of jus sanguinis — citizenship by descent — and asked whether that requirement could be satisfied where the identity of the biological parents was unknown. In each case the burden of proof rested on the applicants to establish the constitutional route relied upon.
The Court held that the applicants had not discharged that burden under either route: the evidence did not establish the foundling presumption under section 19B, and the jus sanguinis requirement could not be satisfied where the biological parents' identity was unknown. It accordingly dismissed the originating summons and made no order as to costs. The judgment is a useful illustration of the evidential thresholds that govern applications for citizenship by operation of law for an adopted child of unknown parentage, and of how the foundling presumption and descent-based citizenship are analysed under the Second Schedule.
Summary
British adoptive parents sought a declaration that their adopted child Lucie Suwara Knowles is a Malaysian citizen by operation of law, relying on s.19B (foundlings) and s.1(e) (statelessness) of the Second Schedule of the Federal Constitution. The High Court dismissed the application, finding the child was not a 'newly born found exposed' as she was handed over by her mother to a care centre, and the biological parents' citizenship could not be established to satisfy the jus sanguinis requirement.
What did the applicants seek?
The adoptive parents sought a declaration that a child in their care, recorded as a non-citizen, is a Malaysian citizen by operation of law under the Second Schedule to the Federal Constitution — relying on the section 19B foundling presumption and on citizenship by descent (jus sanguinis).
Why was the application dismissed?
The Court held the applicants had not discharged the burden of proof: the evidence did not establish that the child was a newborn found exposed so as to invoke the section 19B presumption, and the jus sanguinis requirement could not be met where the biological parents' identity was unknown. The originating summons was dismissed with no order as to costs.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (9)
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.
Read on eJudgmentSource: eJudgment (wa-24-19-03-2023)