Cheung Ho Fat Cyrus v Ng Khar Boon

wa-22ncvc-706-12-2022 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 16 June 2025 • WA-22NCvC-706-12/2022

Catchwords

The Defendant’s Counterclaim is dismissed. She had not discharged her burden of proving her claims. On the Plaintiff’s claim, as the finding is in his favour, costs of RM45,000 is required to be paid by the Defendant, subject to allocator. A penal notice to be endorsed on this judgment.

Practice Areas

The Defendant’s Counterclaim is dismissed. She had not discharged her burden of proving her claims. On the Plaintiff’s claim, as the finding is in his favour, costs of RM45,000 is required to be paid by the Defendant, subject to allocator. A penal notice to be endorsed on this judgment.

Judges (1)

Roz Mawar binti Rozain Delivered

Parties (2)

Cheung Ho Fat Cyrus Plaintiff Ng Khar Boon Defendant

Case Significance

Cheung Ho Fat Cyrus v Ng Khar Boon is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated June 16, 2025 (citation: wa-22ncvc-706-12-2022). The case was decided by Roz Mawar binti Rozain.

What was the outcome of Cheung Ho Fat Cyrus v Ng Khar Boon?

Cheung Ho Fat Cyrus v Ng Khar Boon is a High Court decision dated June 16, 2025. The case was heard by Roz Mawar binti Rozain. See the full judgment for details.