MURALITHARAN A/L GANESALINGAM v PACIFIC VALIANT SDN BHD

wa-22ncvc-623-09-2021 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 7 October 2025 • WA-22NCvC-623-09/2021

Catchwords

Headnotes – if the defendant developer chooses to switch a residential development to a commercial development, it remains liable to pay LAD under the Schedule H sale and purchase agreement it has already entered into if it is unable to deliver vacant possession and common facilities of a residential development unit as contracted for within the time prescribed by the Schedule H sale and purchase agreement

Practice Areas

Headnotes

Judges (1)

Su Tiang Joo Delivered

Parties (2)

PACIFIC VALIANT Sdn Bhd Defendant Muralitharan a/l Ganesalingam Plaintiff

Case Significance

MURALITHARAN A/L GANESALINGAM v PACIFIC VALIANT SDN BHD is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated October 7, 2025 (citation: wa-22ncvc-623-09-2021). The case was decided by Su Tiang Joo.

What was the outcome of MURALITHARAN A/L GANESALINGAM v PACIFIC VALIANT SDN BHD?

MURALITHARAN A/L GANESALINGAM v PACIFIC VALIANT SDN BHD is a High Court decision dated October 7, 2025. The case was heard by Su Tiang Joo. See the full judgment for details.