Greenclipper Corporation Sdn Bhd v Regal Enterprise Sdn Bhd
Catchwords
[1] The Plaintiff files this Suit against the Defendant seeking for the recovery of rental and delivery of vacant possession while the Defendant files a counterclaim against the Plaintiff that the Defendant be relieved against forfeiture of the tenancy, to allow further extension of the tenancy, and alternatively, cost of renovation. [2] The burden of proof is on the Plaintiff and parties are bound by the contract executed by them. The Tenancy Agreement, which terms are clear and unambiguous, must be construed in its literal and natural meaning without any addition or improvement. [3] This Court finds that the Defendant has failed to prove its counter claim, thus is dismissed with costs.
Practice Areas
1 The Plaintiff files this Suit against the Defendant seeking for the recovery of rental and delivery of vacant possession while the Defendant files a counterclaim against the Plaintiff that the Defendant be relieved against forfeiture of the tenancy, to allow further extension of the tenancy, and alternatively, cost of renovation. 2 The burden of proof is on the Plaintiff and parties are bound by the contract executed by them. The Tenancy Agreement, which terms are clear and unambiguous, must be construed in its literal and natural meaning without any addition or improvement. 3 This Court finds that the Defendant has failed to prove its counter claim, thus is dismissed with costs.
Judges (1)
Case Significance
Greenclipper Corporation Sdn Bhd v Regal Enterprise Sdn Bhd is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated June 17, 2025 (citation: wa-22ncvc-469-08-2022). The case was decided by Suzana binti Muhamad Said.
Key issues: [3] This Court finds that the Defendant has failed to prove its counter claim, thus is dismissed with costs..
What was the outcome of Greenclipper Corporation Sdn Bhd v Regal Enterprise Sdn Bhd?
Greenclipper Corporation Sdn Bhd v Regal Enterprise Sdn Bhd is a High Court decision dated June 17, 2025. The case was heard by Suzana binti Muhamad Said. See the full judgment for details.