Revolusi Rancak Sdn Bhd v Bukit Melita Sdn Bhd
Catchwords
The Plaintiff’s claim was dismissed in its entirety, while the Defendant’s counterclaim was allowed in part. Action arises from disputes over the SPA and subsequent dealings between the parties concerning settlement payments and interest following an earlier Court of Appeal decision. Under the SPA, the Plaintiff was obliged to pay the balance purchase price within the contractual completion period. Court's finding - balance of equities and contractual obligations lies with the Defendant. The Plaintiff’s remedy under the Consent Order has been fully realised - what remains are matters of contractual adjustment, not further equitable relief. The Court reiterates that specific performance is a mutual remedy. A purchaser cannot claim its benefits without fulfilling its own correlative duties under the contract.
Practice Areas
The Plaintiff’s claim was dismissed in its entirety, while the Defendant’s counterclaim was allowed in part. Action arises from disputes over the SPA and subsequent dealings between the parties concerning settlement payments and interest following an earlier Court of Appeal decision. Under the SPA, the Plaintiff was obliged to pay the balance purchase price within the contractual completion period. Court's finding
Judges (1)
Case Significance
Revolusi Rancak Sdn Bhd v Bukit Melita Sdn Bhd is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated October 30, 2025 (citation: wa-22ncvc-275-04-2021). The case was decided by Mahazan binti Mat Taib.
What was the outcome of Revolusi Rancak Sdn Bhd v Bukit Melita Sdn Bhd?
Revolusi Rancak Sdn Bhd v Bukit Melita Sdn Bhd is a High Court decision dated October 30, 2025. The case was heard by Mahazan binti Mat Taib. See the full judgment for details.