RICH PRUDENCE SDN BHD v CENVIRO RECYCLING & RECOVERY SDN BHD

wa-22ncc-429-08-2022 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 29 July 2025 • WA-22NCC-429-08/2022

Catchwords

Contract – Misrepresentation – Pre-contractual representations – Entire agreement clause – Exclusion of prior agreements and representations – Collateral contract – Evidence Act 1950 ss.92(a) and 92(b) – No sufficient evidence of binding collateral contract – Variance claims – Contractual notice requirements – Non-compliance with prescribed timeline – “Without prejudice” communications – Evidence Act 1950 s.23 – Inadmissible in absence of concluded settlement – Documents in Part B do not override “without prejudice” privilege – No clear admission of liability – Counterclaim – Alleged unaccounted goods – Burden of proof not discharged.

Practice Areas

Contract

Judges (1)

Wan Muhammad Amin bin Wan Yahya Delivered

Parties (2)

CENVIRO RECYCLING & RECOVERY Sdn Bhd Defendant RICH PRUDENCE Sdn Bhd Plaintiff

Case Significance

RICH PRUDENCE SDN BHD v CENVIRO RECYCLING & RECOVERY SDN BHD is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated July 29, 2025 (citation: wa-22ncc-429-08-2022). The case was decided by Wan Muhammad Amin bin Wan Yahya.

What was the outcome of RICH PRUDENCE SDN BHD v CENVIRO RECYCLING & RECOVERY SDN BHD?

RICH PRUDENCE SDN BHD v CENVIRO RECYCLING & RECOVERY SDN BHD is a High Court decision dated July 29, 2025. The case was heard by Wan Muhammad Amin bin Wan Yahya. See the full judgment for details.