NITIN SHARMA A/L RAM KRISHEN v 1. ) Kerajaan Malaysia 2. ) DR Tang Boon Nee 3. ) Dr Loo Suat Chin 4. ) Dr Ooi Kean Siew 5. ) Dr Komathy a/p Thiagarajan 6. ) Dr Edson Cheah Kit Leng 7. ) Dr Saravanan a/l Krishinan 8. ) Dr Huwaida binti Abdul Halim 9. ) Dr Ng Cheong Keat 10. ) Dr Arulanthu 11. ) Dr Hasbe Zuraina Binti Abu Bakar 12. ) Dr Ruban a/l Sivanoli 13. ) Dr Noriah Othman 14. ) Dr Kumaresan 15. ) Dr Foo Siew Hui 16. ) Dr Ramzan 17. ) Samihah 18. ) Zarino 19. ) Dr Zaki 20. ) Dr David Foo 2...

wa-21ncvc-8-01-2022 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 2 June 2025 • WA-21NCvC-8-01/2022

Catchwords

The plaintiff complains that he suffered catastrophic injuries at birth in Hospital Kuala Lumpur. It is his case that he has since been diagnosed with hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy with hemidystonia resulting in poor function of his right upper and lower limbs due to dystonic movements, mild dysarthria of speech, pes planus with shortening of the right leg, impairments in gait, left knee injury as a result of overuse of the left leg, and habitual shoulder dislocation. In this regard, the court finds that the defendants were negligent in failing to perform an urgent caesarean section despite the plaintiff's mother's emergency. As a result, the plaintiff suffered injuries. Specifically, the plaintiff unnecessarily suffered the adverse effects of a severe cord prolapse due to the doctors' lack of clinical management skills.

Practice Areas

The plaintiff complains that he suffered catastrophic injuries at birth in Hospital Kuala Lumpur. It is his case that he has since been diagnosed with hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy with hemidystonia resulting in poor function of his right upper and lower limbs due to dystonic movements, mild dysarthria of speech, pes planus with shortening of the right leg, impairments in gait, left knee injury as a result of overuse of the left leg, and habitual shoulder dislocation. In this regard, the court finds that the defendants were negligent in failing to perform an urgent caesarean section despite the plaintiff's mother's emergency. As a result, the plaintiff suffered injuries. Specifically, the plaintiff unnecessarily suffered the adverse effects of a severe cord prolapse due to the doctors' lack of clinical management skills.

Judges (1)

Raja Ahmad Mohzanuddin Shah bin Raja Mohzan Delivered

Parties (32)

Kerajaan Malaysia Defendant Dr Arbaiah Defendant Dr Arulanthu Defendant Dr Chee Defendant Dr Chong Defendant Dr David Foo Defendant Dr Edson Cheah Kit Leng Defendant Dr Foo Siew Hui Defendant Dr Hasbe Zuraina binti Abu Bakar Defendant Dr Heena Defendant Dr Huwaida binti Abdul Halim Defendant Dr Komathy a/p Thiagarajan Defendant Dr Kumaresan Defendant Dr Lim Poi Giok Defendant Dr Loo Suat Chin Defendant Dr Ng Cheong Keat Defendant Dr Noriah Othman Defendant Dr Ooi Kean Siew Defendant Dr Ramzan Defendant Dr Rashida Defendant Dr Rheena Defendant Dr Ruban a/l Sivanoli Defendant Dr Sabeeva Defendant Dr Saravanan a/l Krishinan Defendant Dr Selva Defendant Dr Sumatha Defendant Dr Tang Boon Nee Defendant Dr Wong Defendant Dr Zaki Defendant Nitin Sharma a/l Ram Krishen Plaintiff Samihah Defendant Zarino Defendant

Case Significance

NITIN SHARMA A/L RAM KRISHEN v 1. ) Kerajaan Malaysia 2. ) DR Tang Boon Nee 3... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated June 2, 2025 (citation: wa-21ncvc-8-01-2022). The case was decided by Raja Ahmad Mohzanuddin Shah bin Raja Mohzan.

What was the outcome of NITIN SHARMA A/L RAM KRISHEN v 1. ) Kerajaan Malaysia 2. ) DR Tang Boon Nee 3...?

NITIN SHARMA A/L RAM KRISHEN v 1. ) Kerajaan Malaysia 2. ) DR Tang Boon Nee 3... is a High Court decision dated June 2, 2025. The case was heard by Raja Ahmad Mohzanuddin Shah bin Raja Mohzan. See the full judgment for details.