Suruhanjaya Komunikasi Dan Multimedia Malaysia (MCMC), Cyberjaya v 1. ) INDIVIDU YANG TIDAK DIKENALI (Pentadbir Saluran Telegram 'Edisi Siasat') 2. ) INDIVIDU YANG TIDAK DIKENALI (Pentadbir Saluran Telegram 'Edisi Khas') 3. ) TELEGRAM MESSENGER INC
Catchwords
- for interim injunctive relief pending the disposal of the main suit. The Plaintiff seeks wide-ranging interim orders against three Defendants: (a) the First and Second Defendants, being unknown persons who administer Telegram channels styled Edisi Siasat and Edisi Khas; and (b) the Third Defendant, Telegram Messenger Inc., is an internet messaging service provider licensed under the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998 (“CMA 1998”). The Plaintiff alleges that the Defendants are responsible, directly or indirectly, for the publication and dissemination of false, malicious, and offensive content. Reliefs prayed for - (a) A mandatory injunction compelling all the Defendants to immediately remove all false, menacing and offensive contents cited as Impugned Contents from the Impugned Channels; (b) A prohibitory injunction restraining all the Defendants and/or their agents, servants and associates from further uttering, writing, disseminating or publishing, republishing, or distributing the Impugned Contents or words to the effect or similar or in relation to the Impugned Contents; (c) A mandatory injunction directing the Third Defendant to close the Impugned Channels; (d) A mandatory injunction directing the Third Defendant to close similar or new channels that utter, write, disseminate or publish, republish, or distribute the Impugned Contents or words to the effect or similar or in relation to the Impugned Contents; (e) A mandatory injunction compelling the Third Defendant to disclose all available information about the First and Second Defendants. The Court orders as follows: (a) The Plaintiff is granted prohibitory injunctions restraining the Defendants from continuing to publish, disseminate, or republish the specific Impugned Contents identified in the Statement of Claim. (b) The Plaintiff’s prayers for mandatory injunctions compelling closure of the Impugned Channels, closure of any future channels, and disclosure of the administrator details are refused at this stage, without prejudice to the Plaintiff’s right to pursue such relief at trial.
Practice Areas
- for interim injunctive relief pending the disposal of the main suit. The Plaintiff seeks wide-ranging interim orders against three Defendants: (a) the First and Second Defendants, being unknown persons who administer Telegram channels styled Edisi Siasat and Edisi Khas; and (b) the Third Defendant, Telegram Messenger Inc., is an internet messaging service provider licensed under the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998 (“CMA 1998”). The Plaintiff alleges that the Defendants are responsible, directly or indirectly, for the publication and dissemination of false, malicious, and offensive content. Reliefs prayed for The Court orders as follows: (a) The Plaintiff is granted prohibitory injunctions restraining the Defendants from continuing to publish, disseminate, or republish the specific Impugned Contents identified in the Statement of Claim. (b) The Plaintiff’s prayers for mandatory injunctions compelling closure of the Impugned Channels, closure of any future channels, and disclosure of the administrator details are refused at this stage, without prejudice to the Plaintiff’s right to pursue such relief at trial.
Judges (1)
Case Significance
Suruhanjaya Komunikasi Dan Multimedia Malaysia (MCMC), Cyberjaya v 1. ) INDIV... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated September 10, 2025 (citation: wa-21cy-1-05-2025). The case was decided by Mahazan binti Mat Taib.
What was the outcome of Suruhanjaya Komunikasi Dan Multimedia Malaysia (MCMC), Cyberjaya v 1. ) INDIV...?
Suruhanjaya Komunikasi Dan Multimedia Malaysia (MCMC), Cyberjaya v 1. ) INDIV... is a High Court decision dated September 10, 2025. The case was heard by Mahazan binti Mat Taib. See the full judgment for details.